Risk assessment in a research laboratory during sol–gel synthesis of nano-TiO2. (December 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Silva, Francisco; Arezes, Pedro; Swuste, Paul
• Is Part Of: Safety science. Volume 80(2015)
• Page Start: 201
• Page End: 212
• Publication Date: 2015-12
• Subjects: Nanoparticles -- Occupational hygiene -- Exposure -- Inhalation -- Control banding; Industrial accidents -- Periodicals; Accident Prevention -- Periodicals; Safety -- Periodicals; Travail -- Accidents -- Périodiques; 363.11
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.07.010
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0925-7535

Abstract

Highlights: The information collection is very important for risk assessment. Different qualitative risk assessment methods could give different risk levels. The risk assessment should always be considered at the light of existing uncertainties. Abstract: The occupational risks in the nanotechnology research laboratories are an important topic since a great number of researchers are involved in this area. The risk assessment performed by both qualitative and quantitative methods is a necessary step for the management of the occupational risks. Risk assessment could be performed by qualitative methods that gather consensus in the scientific community. It is also possible to use quantitative methods, based in different technics and metrics, as indicative exposure limits are been settled by several institutions. While performing the risk assessment, the information on the materials used is very important and, if it is not updated, it could create a bias in the assessment results. The exposure to TiO2 nanoparticles risk was assessed in a research laboratory using a quantitative exposure method and qualitative risk assessment methods. It was found the results from direct-reading Condensation Particle Counter (CPC) equipment and the CB Nanotool seem to be related and aligned, while the results obtained from the use of the Stoffenmanager Nano seem to indicate a higher risk level.