A review of sex estimation techniques during examination of skeletal remains in forensic anthropology casework. (April 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- A review of sex estimation techniques during examination of skeletal remains in forensic anthropology casework. (April 2016)
- Main Title:
- A review of sex estimation techniques during examination of skeletal remains in forensic anthropology casework
- Authors:
- Krishan, Kewal
Chatterjee, Preetika M.
Kanchan, Tanuj
Kaur, Sandeep
Baryah, Neha
Singh, R.K. - Abstract:
- Highlights: The article reviews sex estimation methods used in forensic anthropology casework. It also discusses the reliability of morphological, metric, molecular and radiographic methods. Direct methods of sex estimation are found to be more reliable than the other methods. GM and DSP methods are emerging as valid and widely used techniques in forensic anthropology. Abstract: Sex estimation is considered as one of the essential parameters in forensic anthropology casework, and requires foremost consideration in the examination of skeletal remains. Forensic anthropologists frequently employ morphologic and metric methods for sex estimation of human remains. These methods are still very imperative in identification process in spite of the advent and accomplishment of molecular techniques. A constant boost in the use of imaging techniques in forensic anthropology research has facilitated to derive as well as revise the available population data. These methods however, are less reliable owing to high variance and indistinct landmark details. The present review discusses the reliability and reproducibility of various analytical approaches; morphological, metric, molecular and radiographic methods in sex estimation of skeletal remains. Numerous studies have shown a higher reliability and reproducibility of measurements taken directly on the bones and hence, such direct methods of sex estimation are considered to be more reliable than the other methods. Geometric morphometricHighlights: The article reviews sex estimation methods used in forensic anthropology casework. It also discusses the reliability of morphological, metric, molecular and radiographic methods. Direct methods of sex estimation are found to be more reliable than the other methods. GM and DSP methods are emerging as valid and widely used techniques in forensic anthropology. Abstract: Sex estimation is considered as one of the essential parameters in forensic anthropology casework, and requires foremost consideration in the examination of skeletal remains. Forensic anthropologists frequently employ morphologic and metric methods for sex estimation of human remains. These methods are still very imperative in identification process in spite of the advent and accomplishment of molecular techniques. A constant boost in the use of imaging techniques in forensic anthropology research has facilitated to derive as well as revise the available population data. These methods however, are less reliable owing to high variance and indistinct landmark details. The present review discusses the reliability and reproducibility of various analytical approaches; morphological, metric, molecular and radiographic methods in sex estimation of skeletal remains. Numerous studies have shown a higher reliability and reproducibility of measurements taken directly on the bones and hence, such direct methods of sex estimation are considered to be more reliable than the other methods. Geometric morphometric (GM) method and Diagnose Sexuelle Probabiliste (DSP) method are emerging as valid methods and widely used techniques in forensic anthropology in terms of accuracy and reliability. Besides, the newer 3D methods are shown to exhibit specific sexual dimorphism patterns not readily revealed by traditional methods. Development of newer and better methodologies for sex estimation as well as re-evaluation of the existing ones will continue in the endeavour of forensic researchers for more accurate results. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Forensic science international. Volume 261(2016)
- Journal:
- Forensic science international
- Issue:
- Volume 261(2016)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 261, Issue 2016 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 261
- Issue:
- 2016
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0261-2016-0000
- Page Start:
- 165.e1
- Page End:
- 165.e8
- Publication Date:
- 2016-04
- Subjects:
- Forensic sciences -- Forensic anthropology -- Sex estimation methods -- Skeletal remains -- Direct methods versus indirect methods -- Forensic Anthropology Population Data
Medical jurisprudence -- Periodicals
Chemistry, Forensic -- Periodicals
Forensic Medicine -- Periodicals
Médecine légale -- Périodiques
Chimie légale -- Périodiques
Gerechtelijke geneeskunde
Gerechtelijke chemie
Gerechtelijke psychiatrie
Chemistry, Forensic
Medical jurisprudence
Electronic journals
Periodicals
Electronic journals
614.1 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/03790738 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/03790738 ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/03790738 ↗
http://infotrac.galegroup.com/itw/infomark/1/1/1/purl=rc18_EAIM_0__jn+%22Forensic+Science+International%22?sw_aep=stand ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/homepage/elecserv.htt ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.02.007 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0379-0738
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3987.764000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 7769.xml