Comparison of Guy's vs S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry scoring systems in predicting the success rate of PCNL. (September 2017)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Comparison of Guy's vs S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry scoring systems in predicting the success rate of PCNL. (September 2017)
- Main Title:
- Comparison of Guy's vs S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry scoring systems in predicting the success rate of PCNL
- Authors:
- Rathee, VS
HC, Vivek
Khan, Sartaj Wali
Singh, AK
Shukla, Pushpender Kumar
Verma, Ashish
Trivedi, Sameer
Dwivedi, Udai Shankar - Abstract:
- Introduction and objective: The aim of the present study was to compare the accuracy of the Guy's and S.T.O.N.E. scoring systems in predicting percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) outcomes. Methods: This prospective study was carried out in the Department of Urology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, between August 2013 and September 2015 in collaboration with the Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging. A total of 100 cases of renal calculi operated on with PCNL were considered in the study on the basis of CT morphodensitometry. The study was approved by the institute's ethical committee. Guy's and S.T.O.N.E. scoring systems were calculated. Regression analysis and ROC curves were performed. Results: A total of 100 PCNLs were operated on. The overall stone-free rate was 90% with a complication rate of 17%. When compared to patients with residual fragments, stone-free patients had significantly lower Guy's grade (3.5 vs 2; p < 0.001) and S.T.O.N.E. score (9.1 vs 7.5; p = 0.023). Logistic regression analysis showed that both Guy's and S.T.O.N.E. systems were significantly associated with stone-free status, OR 0.96 ( p < 0.001) and OR 0.94 ( p < 0.001), respectively. Furthermore, both scoring systems were significantly associated with estimated blood loss ( p = 0.02 and p = 0.004). There was good correlation between both scoring systems and operative time ( r = 0.2, p < 0.002 and r = 0.3, p < 0.002) and length of hospital stay ( r = 0.1, p =Introduction and objective: The aim of the present study was to compare the accuracy of the Guy's and S.T.O.N.E. scoring systems in predicting percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) outcomes. Methods: This prospective study was carried out in the Department of Urology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, between August 2013 and September 2015 in collaboration with the Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging. A total of 100 cases of renal calculi operated on with PCNL were considered in the study on the basis of CT morphodensitometry. The study was approved by the institute's ethical committee. Guy's and S.T.O.N.E. scoring systems were calculated. Regression analysis and ROC curves were performed. Results: A total of 100 PCNLs were operated on. The overall stone-free rate was 90% with a complication rate of 17%. When compared to patients with residual fragments, stone-free patients had significantly lower Guy's grade (3.5 vs 2; p < 0.001) and S.T.O.N.E. score (9.1 vs 7.5; p = 0.023). Logistic regression analysis showed that both Guy's and S.T.O.N.E. systems were significantly associated with stone-free status, OR 0.96 ( p < 0.001) and OR 0.94 ( p < 0.001), respectively. Furthermore, both scoring systems were significantly associated with estimated blood loss ( p = 0.02 and p = 0.004). There was good correlation between both scoring systems and operative time ( r = 0.2, p < 0.002 and r = 0.3, p < 0.002) and length of hospital stay ( r = 0.1, p = 0.002 and r = 0.2, p < 0.002). There were significant associations between both scoring systems and complications ( p < 0.001 and p = 0.004). There was no significant difference in the areas under the curves for the Guy's and S.T.O.N.E. scoring systems (0.96 (95% CI 0.92–0.99) vs 0.94 (95% CI 0.89–1.001); p < 0.001). Conclusion: Both Guy's and S.T.O.N.E scoring systems have comparable accuracies in predicting post-PCNL stone-free status. Other factors not included in either scoring system may need to be incorporated in the future to increase their accuracy. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of clinical urology. Volume 10:Number 5(2017)
- Journal:
- Journal of clinical urology
- Issue:
- Volume 10:Number 5(2017)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 10, Issue 5 (2017)
- Year:
- 2017
- Volume:
- 10
- Issue:
- 5
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2017-0010-0005-0000
- Page Start:
- 423
- Page End:
- 429
- Publication Date:
- 2017-09
- Subjects:
- Percutaneous nephrolithotomy -- scoring method -- renal calculi
Genitourinary organs -- Surgery -- Periodicals
Genitourinary organs -- Diseases -- Periodicals
Urology -- Periodicals
616.6005 - Journal URLs:
- http://uro.sagepub.com/ ↗
http://www.uk.sagepub.com/home.nav ↗
http://www.uk.sagepub.com/journals/Journal202162 ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1177/2051415816689360 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2051-4158
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 7774.xml