Consistent improvement in health-related quality of life with tiotropium in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Novel and conventional responder analyses. (November 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Consistent improvement in health-related quality of life with tiotropium in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Novel and conventional responder analyses. (November 2016)
- Main Title:
- Consistent improvement in health-related quality of life with tiotropium in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Novel and conventional responder analyses
- Authors:
- Tashkin, Donald P.
Bateman, Eric D.
Jones, Paul
Zubek, Valentina B.
Metzdorf, Norbert
Liu, Dacheng
Leonard, Thomas
Clerisme-Beaty, Emmanuelle
Wise, Robert A. - Abstract:
- Abstract: Introduction: Improving health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in COPD patients is an important pharmacotherapeutic objective. This study investigated the extent, consistency, and durability of tiotropium maintenance therapy impact on HRQoL in moderate-to-very severe COPD. Methods: Patients received once-daily tiotropium 18 μg (n = 5244) or placebo (n = 4799) via HandiHaler ® (10 trials), or once-daily tiotropium 5 μg (n = 2622) or placebo (n = 2618) via Respimat ® inhaler (3 trials). St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total scores were measured at baseline, and 6 months (13 trials) and 1 year (9 trials) from treatment start. Adjusted mean differences between treatments for change from baseline in total scores were calculated at each time-point for each trial. Responder and deteriorator rates (decrease or increase in score ≥4 units from baseline, respectively), net benefit (responder rate increase plus deteriorator rate decrease), and cumulative improvement and deterioration were determined. Results: Adjusted mean total score differences between treatments for change from baseline were significant (p < 0.05) in favor of tiotropium in 10/13 trials at 6 months and in 8/9 trials at 1 year. In all trials, estimated differences in responder rates between treatments favored tiotropium (significant [p < 0.05]: 5/13 trials at 6 months; 8/9 trials at 1 year). Net benefit favored tiotropium and cumulative improvement rates were consistently greater andAbstract: Introduction: Improving health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in COPD patients is an important pharmacotherapeutic objective. This study investigated the extent, consistency, and durability of tiotropium maintenance therapy impact on HRQoL in moderate-to-very severe COPD. Methods: Patients received once-daily tiotropium 18 μg (n = 5244) or placebo (n = 4799) via HandiHaler ® (10 trials), or once-daily tiotropium 5 μg (n = 2622) or placebo (n = 2618) via Respimat ® inhaler (3 trials). St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total scores were measured at baseline, and 6 months (13 trials) and 1 year (9 trials) from treatment start. Adjusted mean differences between treatments for change from baseline in total scores were calculated at each time-point for each trial. Responder and deteriorator rates (decrease or increase in score ≥4 units from baseline, respectively), net benefit (responder rate increase plus deteriorator rate decrease), and cumulative improvement and deterioration were determined. Results: Adjusted mean total score differences between treatments for change from baseline were significant (p < 0.05) in favor of tiotropium in 10/13 trials at 6 months and in 8/9 trials at 1 year. In all trials, estimated differences in responder rates between treatments favored tiotropium (significant [p < 0.05]: 5/13 trials at 6 months; 8/9 trials at 1 year). Net benefit favored tiotropium and cumulative improvement rates were consistently greater and deterioration rates consistently lower for tiotropium versus placebo. Conclusions: Tiotropium maintenance therapy significantly and consistently improved HRQoL in moderate-to-very severe COPD patients in a durable manner. These results may provide a benchmark for assessing benefits on HRQoL of other COPD treatments. Highlights: Novel SGRQ response analyses assessed HRQoL in COPD (tiotropium vs placebo). SGRQ total scores were consistently better for patients on tiotropium vs placebo. SGRQ score net benefit was better for tiotropium vs placebo at 6 months and 1 year. Tiotropium maintenance therapy vs placebo had long-term sustained benefit on HRQoL. These data may be a benchmark to assess benefits on HRQoL of other COPD therapies. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Respiratory medicine. Volume 120(2016)
- Journal:
- Respiratory medicine
- Issue:
- Volume 120(2016)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 120, Issue 2016 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 120
- Issue:
- 2016
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0120-2016-0000
- Page Start:
- 91
- Page End:
- 100
- Publication Date:
- 2016-11
- Subjects:
- Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) -- Clinical trials -- Health-related quality of life -- Responder and deteriorator rates -- St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) -- Tiotropium
COPD chronic obstructive pulmonary disease -- EXACTT Exercise Endurance and COPD Patients Treated with Tiotropium -- FEV1 forced expiratory volume in 1 s -- FVC forced vital capacity -- HRQoL health-related quality of life -- ICS inhaled corticosteroids -- LABA long-acting β-agonist -- LAMA long-acting muscarinic antagonist -- MCID minimal clinically important difference -- MMRM mixed model repeated measures -- SAFE Spiriva Assessment of FEV1 -- SGRQ St George's Respiratory Questionnaire -- TIPHON Tiotropium: Influence sur la Perception de làmélioration des activités Habituelles Objectivée par une échelle Numérique -- UPLIFT Understanding Potential Long-term Impacts on Function with Tiotropium
Chest -- Diseases -- Periodicals
Chest -- Diseases -- Great Britain -- Periodicals
Respiratory organs -- Diseases -- Periodicals
Respiratory Tract Diseases -- Periodicals
Appareil respiratoire -- Maladies -- Périodiques
Thorax -- Maladies -- Périodiques
Appareil respiratoire -- Maladies -- Traitement -- Périodiques
Electronic journals
616.2 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/09546111 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/09546111 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/09546111 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.rmed.2016.10.002 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0954-6111
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 7777.661900
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 7746.xml