Biallelic tumour suppressor loss and DNA repair defects in de novo small‐cell prostate carcinoma. Issue 2 (28th August 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Chedgy, Edmund CP; Vandekerkhove, Gillian; Herberts, Cameron; Annala, Matti; Donoghue, Adam J; Sigouros, Michael; Ritch, Elie; Struss, Werner; Konomura, Saki; Liew, Janet; Parimi, Sunil; Vergidis, Joanna; Hurtado‐Coll, Antonio; Sboner, Andrea; Fazli, Ladan; Beltran, Himisha; Chi, Kim N; Wyatt, Alexander W
• Is Part Of: Journal of pathology. Volume 246:Issue 2(2018)
• Page Start: 244
• Page End: 253
• Publication Date: 2018-08-28
• Subjects: SCPC -- small‐cell carcinoma -- castration resistance -- DNA repair -- BRCA2 -- sequencing -- precision oncology, NEPC; Pathology -- Periodicals; 616.07
• DOI: 10.1002/path.5137
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0022-3417

Abstract

Abstract: Small‐cell prostate carcinoma (SCPC) is an aggressive malignancy that is managed similarly to small‐cell lung cancer. SCPC can evolve from prostate adenocarcinoma in response to androgen deprivation therapy, but, in rare cases, is present at initial cancer diagnosis. The molecular aetiology of de novo SCPC is incompletely understood, owing to the scarcity of tumour tissue and the short life‐expectancy of patients. Through a retrospective search of our regional oncology pharmacy database, we identified 18 patients diagnosed with de novo SCPC between 2004 and 2017. Ten patients had pure SCPC pathology, and the remainder had some admixed adenocarcinoma foci, but all were treated with first‐line platinum‐based chemotherapy. The median overall survival was 28 months. We performed targeted DNA sequencing, whole exome sequencing and mRNA profiling on formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded archival tumour tissue. We observed frequent biallelic deletion and/or mutation of the tumour suppressor genes TP53, RB1, and PTEN, similarly to what was found in treatment‐related SCPC. Indeed, at the RNA level, pure de novo SCPC closely resembled treatment‐related SCPC. However, five patients had biallelic loss of DNA repair genes, including BRCA1, BRCA2, ATM, and MSH2 / 6, potentially underlying the high genomic instability of this rare disease variant. Two patients with pure de novo SCPC harboured ETS gene rearrangements involving androgen‐driven promoters, consistent with the evolution of de novo SCPC from an androgen‐driven ancestor. Overall, our results reveal a highly aggressive molecular landscape that underlies this unusual pathological variant, and suggest opportunities for targeted therapy strategies in a disease with few treatment options. Copyright © 2018 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.