Barriers to and enablers of diabetic retinopathy screening attendance: a systematic review of published and grey literature. Issue 10 (6th June 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Graham‐Rowe, E.; Lorencatto, F.; Lawrenson, J. G.; Burr, J. M.; Grimshaw, J. M.; Ivers, N. M.; Presseau, J.; Vale, L.; Peto, T.; Bunce, C.; J Francis, J.
• Is Part Of: Diabetic medicine. Volume 35:Issue 10(2018)
• Page Start: 1308
• Page End: 1319
• Publication Date: 2018-06-06
• Subjects: Diabetes -- Periodicals; 616.462
• DOI: 10.1111/dme.13686
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0742-3071

Abstract

Abstract: Aims: To identify and synthesize studies reporting modifiable barriers/enablers associated with retinopathy screening attendance in people with Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes, and to identify those most likely to influence attendance. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library and the 'grey literature' for quantitative and qualitative studies to February 2017. Data (i.e. participant quotations, interpretive summaries, survey results) reporting barriers/enablers were extracted and deductively coded into domains from the Theoretical Domains Framework; with domains representing categories of theoretical barriers/enablers proposed to mediate behaviour change. Inductive thematic analysis was conducted within domains to describe the role each domain plays in facilitating or hindering screening attendance. Domains that were more frequently coded and for which more themes were generated were judged more likely to influence attendance. Results: Sixty‐nine primary studies were included. We identified six theoretical domains ['environmental context and resources' (75% of included studies), 'social influences' (51%), 'knowledge' (51%), 'memory, attention, decision processes' (50%), 'beliefs about consequences' (38%) and 'emotions' (33%)] as the key mediators of diabetic retinopathy screening attendance. Examples of barriers populating these domains included inaccurate diabetic registers and confusion between routine eye care and retinopathy screening. Recommendations by healthcare professionals and community‐level media coverage acted as enablers. Conclusions: Across a variety of contexts, we found common barriers to and enablers of retinopathy screening that could be targeted in interventions aiming to increase screening attendance. What's new?: Diabetic retinopathy screening is effective but uptake is sub‐optimal. Theoretical determinants (barriers and enablers) of screening attendance were identified that operate at the level of the person with diabetes (e.g. confusion between retinopathy screening and routine eye care), the healthcare professionals (e.g. lack of recommendation to screen), the healthcare system (e.g. inaccurate registers), and the wider community (e.g. lack of media coverage). Findings from this study will help to inform which theoretical determinants to target in interventions that seek to improve attendance at diabetic retinopathy screening.