Skin cancers and dermal substitutes: Is it safe? Review of the literature and presentation of a 2‐stage surgical protocol for the treatment of non‐melanoma skin cancers of the head in fragile patients. Issue 5 (4th June 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Marcasciano, Marco; Mazzocchi, Marco; Kaciulyte, Juste; Spissu, Noemi; Casella, Donato; Ribuffo, Diego; Dessy, Luca Andrea
• Is Part Of: International wound journal. Volume 15:Issue 5(2018)
• Page Start: 756
• Page End: 768
• Publication Date: 2018-06-04
• Subjects: dermal substitute -- head region -- non‐melanoma skin cancer -- review -- skin graft; Wounds and injuries -- Treatment -- Periodicals; Wounds and injuries -- Periodicals; Wound healing -- Periodicals; 617.1005
• DOI: 10.1111/iwj.12924
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1742-4801

Abstract

Abstract : Non‐melanoma skin cancers (NMSC) represent the most common skin tumours of the head region. We describe the use of dermal substitute in a 2‐stage surgery protocol for selected fragile patients to remove NMSC of the head region. A review of the literature focusing on dermal substitutes' safety after skin tumours excision is provided. A total of 45 fragile patients with NMSC in the head region were selected and scheduled for the 2‐stage surgical protocol. The first stage consisted of traditional surgical excision and immediate coverage with Hyalomatrix (Fidia Advanced Biopolymers, Abano Terme, Italy). After histology confirmed diagnosis and clearance of the margins, full‐thickness skin autografts were performed. All of the patients reached complete tumour excision and wound healing. No local recurrences were registered during 24 months follow up. The 2‐stage surgical therapeutic‐diagnostic‐reconstructive approach represents a less stressful and oncologically safe surgical protocol in selected fragile patients. When patients cannot tolerate invasive and long surgical procedures, general anaesthesia, and long hospitalisation, skin grafting following temporary skin substitute coverage can achieve oncological clearance and provide good functional and aesthetic results. The use of dermal substitutes represents a valid alternative surgical option in cases of ASA III, fragile patients non‐eligible for complex reconstructive surgery. To our knowledge, this is the first paper reviewing literature focusing on dermal substitutes' applications and safety after skin tumour excision.