Evaluation of differences between dual salt‐pH gradient elution and mono gradient elution using a thermodynamic model: Simultaneous separation of six monoclonal antibody charge and size variants on preparative‐scale ion exchange chromatographic resin. (25th March 2018)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Evaluation of differences between dual salt‐pH gradient elution and mono gradient elution using a thermodynamic model: Simultaneous separation of six monoclonal antibody charge and size variants on preparative‐scale ion exchange chromatographic resin. (25th March 2018)
- Main Title:
- Evaluation of differences between dual salt‐pH gradient elution and mono gradient elution using a thermodynamic model: Simultaneous separation of six monoclonal antibody charge and size variants on preparative‐scale ion exchange chromatographic resin
- Authors:
- Lee, Yi Feng
Jöhnck, Matthias
Frech, Christian - Abstract:
- Abstract : The efficiencies of mono gradient elution and dual salt‐pH gradient elution for separation of six mAb charge and size variants on a preparative‐scale ion exchange chromatographic resin are compared in this study. Results showed that opposite dual salt‐pH gradient elution with increasing pH gradient and simultaneously decreasing salt gradient is best suited for the separation of these mAb charge and size variants on Eshmuno ® CPX. Besides giving high binding capacity, this type of opposite dual salt‐pH gradient also provides better resolved mAb variant peaks and lower conductivity in the elution pools compared to single pH or salt gradients. To have a mechanistic understanding of the differences in mAb variants retention behaviors of mono pH gradient, parallel dual salt‐pH gradient, and opposite dual salt‐pH gradient, a linear gradient elution model was used. After determining the model parameters using the linear gradient elution model, 2D plots were used to show the pH and salt dependencies of the reciprocals of distribution coefficient, equilibrium constant, and effective ionic capacity of the mAb variants in these gradient elution systems. Comparison of the 2D plots indicated that the advantage of opposite dual salt‐pH gradient system with increasing pH gradient and simultaneously decreasing salt gradient is the noncontinuous increased acceleration of protein migration. Furthermore, the fitted model parameters can be used for the prediction and optimization ofAbstract : The efficiencies of mono gradient elution and dual salt‐pH gradient elution for separation of six mAb charge and size variants on a preparative‐scale ion exchange chromatographic resin are compared in this study. Results showed that opposite dual salt‐pH gradient elution with increasing pH gradient and simultaneously decreasing salt gradient is best suited for the separation of these mAb charge and size variants on Eshmuno ® CPX. Besides giving high binding capacity, this type of opposite dual salt‐pH gradient also provides better resolved mAb variant peaks and lower conductivity in the elution pools compared to single pH or salt gradients. To have a mechanistic understanding of the differences in mAb variants retention behaviors of mono pH gradient, parallel dual salt‐pH gradient, and opposite dual salt‐pH gradient, a linear gradient elution model was used. After determining the model parameters using the linear gradient elution model, 2D plots were used to show the pH and salt dependencies of the reciprocals of distribution coefficient, equilibrium constant, and effective ionic capacity of the mAb variants in these gradient elution systems. Comparison of the 2D plots indicated that the advantage of opposite dual salt‐pH gradient system with increasing pH gradient and simultaneously decreasing salt gradient is the noncontinuous increased acceleration of protein migration. Furthermore, the fitted model parameters can be used for the prediction and optimization of mAb variants separation in dual salt‐pH gradient and step elution. © 2018 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Biotechnol. Prog., 34:973–986, 2018 … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Biotechnology progress. Volume 34:Number 4(2018)
- Journal:
- Biotechnology progress
- Issue:
- Volume 34:Number 4(2018)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 34, Issue 4 (2018)
- Year:
- 2018
- Volume:
- 34
- Issue:
- 4
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2018-0034-0004-0000
- Page Start:
- 973
- Page End:
- 986
- Publication Date:
- 2018-03-25
- Subjects:
- dual and mono gradient elution -- charge and size variants separation -- monoclonal antibody -- ion exchange chromatography -- thermodynamic modeling
Biotechnology -- Periodicals
Food industry and trade -- Periodicals
Bioengineering -- Periodicals
660.6 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1021/(ISSN)1520-6033 ↗
http://pubs3.acs.org/acs/journals/toc.page?incoden=bipret ↗
http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/121373624/home ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/btpr.2626 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 8756-7938
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 2089.868330
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 7678.xml