Assessing the abilities of intrinsic and specific vulnerability models to indicate groundwater vulnerability to groups of similar pesticides: a comparative study. (2nd November 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Douglas, Steven H.; Dixon, Barnali; Griffin, Dale
• Is Part Of: Physical geography. Volume 39:Number 6(2018)
• Page Start: 487
• Page End: 505
• Publication Date: 2018-11-02
• Subjects: Groundwater -- vulnerability -- DRASTIC -- attenuation factor -- bromacil -- dibromoethane; Physical geography -- Periodicals; 910.02
• DOI: 10.1080/02723646.2017.1406300
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0272-3646

Abstract

Abstract: With continued population growth and increasing use of fresh groundwater resources, protection of this valuable resource is critical. A cost effective means to assess risk of groundwater contamination potential will provide a useful tool to protect these resources. Integrating geospatial methods offers a means to quantify the risk of contaminant potential in cost effective and spatially explicit ways. This research was designed to compare the ability of intrinsic (DRASTIC) and specific (Attenuation Factor; AF) vulnerability models to indicate groundwater vulnerability areas by comparing model results to the presence of pesticides from groundwater sample datasets. A logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between the environmental variables and the presence or absence of pesticides within regions of varying vulnerability. According to the DRASTIC model, more than 20% of the study area is very highly vulnerable. Approximately 30% is very highly vulnerable according to the AF model. When groundwater concentrations of individual pesticides were compared to model predictions, the results were mixed. Model predictability improved when concentrations of the group of similar pesticides were compared to model results. Compared to the DRASTIC model, the AF model more accurately predicts the distribution of the number of contaminated wells within each vulnerability class.