The Common Destiny Framework, Citizenship and Customary Governance in Kanaky/New Caledonia. Issue 3 (2nd September 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Korson, Cadey
• Is Part Of: Forum for development studies. Volume 45:Issue 3(2018)
• Page Start: 437
• Page End: 460
• Publication Date: 2018-09-02
• Subjects: indigenous peoples -- sovereignty -- governance -- referendum -- development -- Oceania; Developing countries -- Periodicals; 338.90091724
• DOI: 10.1080/08039410.2018.1464058
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0803-9410

Abstract

Abstract: In New Caledonia, the indigenous Kanak people maintain strong representation in domestic institutions and have a demographic majority. Combined with the ongoing devolution of power from France, New Caledonian politicians as a whole are well placed to explore alternative and plural forms of governance and citizenship throughout this process. Tensions and inequalities between French-Caledonians, Kanak and recent migrants from other pacific Islands, Asia and Europe have previously hindered the development of plural governance. However, the devolution of power and upcoming decision on the sovereignty of the country offer an opportunity to overcome these differences and create a stronger system of inclusion. Drawing on interviews with New Caledonian politicians, news reports and policy documents this article explores the origin and redefinition of the common destiny narrative: a discourse that embodies a sense of cooperation and the invention of a unified New Caledonia society that encourages equal opportunity and the integration of indigenous knowledges. Various definitions of common destiny reflect politicians' approaches to mitigating inequalities through intermarriage, nation building, or pluralism. In concert with the referenda, politicians have the responsibility of defining a New Caledonian citizenship and determining who will have access to this label. The upcoming referenda on sovereignty and unique position of indigenous power in New Caledonia offer an opportunity for policy-makers to negotiate a system of governance that integrates multiple knowledges and, in the context of common destiny, develop a more representative citizenship that cuts across societal divisions.