Navigating the Institutional Review Board (IRB) Process for Pharmacy-Related Research. Issue 2 (February 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Phillips, Marjorie Shaw; Abdelghany, Osama; Johnston, Susan; Rarus, Rachel; Austin-Szwak, Jennifer; Kirkwood, Craig
• Is Part Of: Hospital pharmacy. Volume 52:Issue 2(2017)
• Page Start: 105
• Page End: 116
• Publication Date: 2017-02
• Subjects: institutional review board -- IRB -- pharmacy research -- pharmacy residents; Hospital pharmacies -- Periodicals; Pharmacy Service, Hospital; Hospital pharmacies; Periodicals; Periodicals; 615.1
• DOI: 10.1310/hpj5202-105
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0018-5787

Abstract

Pharmacists' specialized training and knowledge qualify them to lead and engage in research pertaining to optimal medication use. Performing research promotes pharmacy professionalism and fosters interdisciplinary collaboration. To conduct research appropriately, one must have thorough knowledge of when institutional review board (IRB) approval is required and how to successfully navigate IRB processes. The overarching mission of the IRB overseeing research at an organization per federal guidelines is to protect the rights and welfare of human subjects participating in research. This article discusses the following general pharmacy practice–based considerations relating to IRB processes: strategies for developing research projects, key distinctions between quality improvement and research, practical considerations for submitting IRB applications and documentation, different categories of IRB submission, informed consent and conditions for waivers or alterations of consent, and principal investigator obligations for approved research. Pharmacists should also account for organization-specific IRB processes when designing, submitting, and implementing research projects.