An analysis of error reconciliation protocols used in Quantum Key Distribution systems. (July 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Johnson, James S; Grimaila, Michael R; Humphries, Jeffrey W.; Baumgartner, Gerald B
• Is Part Of: Journal of defense modeling and simulation. Volume 12:Number 3(2015:Jul.)
• Page Start: 217
• Page End: 227
• Publication Date: 2015-07
• Subjects: Quantum Key Distribution -- error reconciliation -- quantum cryptography; Military art and science -- Computer simulation -- Periodicals; 355.0011305
• DOI: 10.1177/1548512913503418
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1548-5129

Abstract

Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) is a revolutionary security technology that exploits the laws of quantum mechanics to achieve information-theoretic secure key exchange. QKD enables two parties to "grow" a shared secret key without placing any limits on an adversary's computational power. Error reconciliation protocols have been developed that preserve security while allowing a sender and receiver to reconcile the errors in their respective keys. The most famous of these is the Cascade protocol, which is effective but suffers from a high communication complexity and low throughput. The Winnow protocol reduces the communication complexity over Cascade, but has the disadvantage of introducing errors. Finally, Low Density Parity Check (LDPC) codes have been shown to reconcile errors at rates higher than those of Cascade and Winnow, but with greater computational complexity. In this paper we evaluate the effectiveness of LDPC codes by comparing the runtime, throughput and communication complexity empirically with the Cascade and Winnow algorithms. The effects of inaccurate error estimation, non-uniform error distribution and varying key length on all three protocols are evaluated for identical input key strings. Analyses are performed on the results in order to characterize the strengths and weaknesses of each protocol.