Morphology evaluation of nonmass enhancement on breast MRI: Effect of a three-step interpretation model for readers' performances and biopsy recommendations. Issue 2 (February 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Morphology evaluation of nonmass enhancement on breast MRI: Effect of a three-step interpretation model for readers' performances and biopsy recommendations. Issue 2 (February 2016)
- Main Title:
- Morphology evaluation of nonmass enhancement on breast MRI: Effect of a three-step interpretation model for readers' performances and biopsy recommendations
- Authors:
- Shimauchi, Akiko
Ota, Hideki
Machida, Youichi
Yoshida, Tamiko
Satani, Nozomi
Mori, Naoko
Takase, Kei
Tozaki, Mitsuhiro - Abstract:
- Graphical abstract: Highlights: Nonmass lesion 3-step interpretation model improves less-experienced readers' performance. Nonmass lesion 3-step interpretation model improves readers' mean sensitivity. Branching, clumped, clustered ring enhancement signs are predictors of malignancy. Abstract: Objective: To evaluate and compare the use of a newly introduced interpretation model for breast nonmass enhancement (NME, defined as an area of enhancement without a three-dimensional, space-occupying lesion) with the use of the standard interpretation method based on BI-RADS. Materials and methods: Two expert and two less-experienced breast imaging radiologists performed reading sessions of 86 malignant and 64 benign NME lesions twice. First, radiologists characterized NME using BI-RADS descriptors and assessed the likelihood of malignancy and need for a biopsy. Second, the likelihood of malignancy and need for a biopsy were assessed with the use of the model, in which three-step characterization of morphological features were performed: (1) selection of distribution modifiers, (2) homogeneous vs . heterogeneous internal enhancement (IE) pattern, and (3) evaluation of presence of "clumped", "clustered ring enhancement (CRE)", and "branching" IE signs. Multireader-multicase receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to evaluate observers' performances. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed for morphology descriptors. Results: With use of theGraphical abstract: Highlights: Nonmass lesion 3-step interpretation model improves less-experienced readers' performance. Nonmass lesion 3-step interpretation model improves readers' mean sensitivity. Branching, clumped, clustered ring enhancement signs are predictors of malignancy. Abstract: Objective: To evaluate and compare the use of a newly introduced interpretation model for breast nonmass enhancement (NME, defined as an area of enhancement without a three-dimensional, space-occupying lesion) with the use of the standard interpretation method based on BI-RADS. Materials and methods: Two expert and two less-experienced breast imaging radiologists performed reading sessions of 86 malignant and 64 benign NME lesions twice. First, radiologists characterized NME using BI-RADS descriptors and assessed the likelihood of malignancy and need for a biopsy. Second, the likelihood of malignancy and need for a biopsy were assessed with the use of the model, in which three-step characterization of morphological features were performed: (1) selection of distribution modifiers, (2) homogeneous vs . heterogeneous internal enhancement (IE) pattern, and (3) evaluation of presence of "clumped", "clustered ring enhancement (CRE)", and "branching" IE signs. Multireader-multicase receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to evaluate observers' performances. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed for morphology descriptors. Results: With use of the model, average Az of less-experienced radiologists (0.77–0.83; p = 0.013) and average sensitivity of all radiologists (96.2–98.2%; p = 0.007) improved significantly. NPV also improved but nonsignificantly (81.1–91.9%; p = 0.055). Multivariate analyses of the second reading showed branching, clumped, and CRE signs to be significant predictors of malignancy in the results of 3, 2, and 2 readers, respectively. Conclusion: The three-step interpretation model for NME has the potential to improve less-experienced radiologists' performances, making them comparable to expert breast imagers. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- European journal of radiology. Volume 85:Issue 2(2016)
- Journal:
- European journal of radiology
- Issue:
- Volume 85:Issue 2(2016)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 85, Issue 2 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 85
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0085-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- 480
- Page End:
- 488
- Publication Date:
- 2016-02
- Subjects:
- Radiology -- Breast -- Magnetic resonance imaging -- Cancer -- Breast tumors
Medical radiology -- Periodicals
Radiology -- Periodicals
Radiologie médicale -- Périodiques
Medical radiology
Periodicals
616.075705 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/0720048X ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/homepage/elecserv.htt ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/0720048X ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/0720048X ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.11.043 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0720-048X
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3829.738050
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 7638.xml