Item Response Theory Analysis of ADHD Symptoms in Children With and Without ADHD. (December 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Li, James J.; Reise, Steven P.; Chronis-Tuscano, Andrea; Mikami, Amori Yee; Lee, Steve S.
• Is Part Of: Assessment. Volume 23:Number 6(2016:Dec.)
• Page Start: 655
• Page End: 671
• Publication Date: 2016-12
• Subjects: item response theory -- attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder -- psychometrics; Psychological tests -- Periodicals; Psychodiagnostics -- Periodicals; Personality tests -- Periodicals; 150.287
• DOI: 10.1177/1073191115591595
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1073-1911

Abstract

Item response theory (IRT) was separately applied to parent- and teacher-rated symptoms of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) from a pooled sample of 526 six- to twelve-year-old children with and without ADHD. The dimensional structure ADHD was first examined using confirmatory factor analyses, including the bifactor model. A general ADHD factor and two group factors, representing inattentive and hyperactive/impulsive dimensions, optimally fit the data. Using the graded response model, we estimated discrimination and location parameters and information functions for all 18 symptoms of ADHD. Parent- and teacher-rated symptoms demonstrated adequate discrimination and location values, although these estimates varied substantially. For parent ratings, the test information curve peaked between −2 and +2 SD, suggesting that ADHD symptoms exhibited excellent overall reliability at measuring children in the low to moderate range of the general ADHD factor, but not in the extreme ranges. Similar results emerged for teacher ratings, in which the peak range of measurement precision was from −1.40 to 1.90 SD . Several symptoms were comparatively more informative than others; for example, is often easily distracted ("Distracted") was the most informative parent- and teacher-rated symptom across the latent trait continuum. Clinical implications for the assessment of ADHD as well as relevant considerations for future revisions to diagnostic criteria are discussed.