Which Statistic Should Be Used to Detect Item Preknowledge When the Set of Compromised Items Is Known?. (September 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sinharay, Sandip
• Is Part Of: Applied psychological measurement. Volume 41:Number 6(2017)
• Page Start: 403
• Page End: 421
• Publication Date: 2017-09
• Subjects: cheating -- fraud -- test security; Psychometrics -- Periodicals; Psychological tests -- Periodicals; Psychology, Applied -- Periodicals; 150.1519505
• DOI: 10.1177/0146621617698453
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0146-6216

Abstract

Benefiting from item preknowledge is a major type of fraudulent behavior during educational assessments. Belov suggested the posterior shift statistic for detection of item preknowledge and showed its performance to be better on average than that of seven other statistics for detection of item preknowledge for a known set of compromised items. Sinharay suggested a statistic based on the likelihood ratio test for detection of item preknowledge; the advantage of the statistic is that its null distribution is known. Results from simulated and real data and adaptive and nonadaptive tests are used to demonstrate that the Type I error rate and power of the statistic based on the likelihood ratio test are very similar to those of the posterior shift statistic. Thus, the statistic based on the likelihood ratio test appears promising in detecting item preknowledge when the set of compromised items is known.