System transverse in-plane shear stiffness of pultruded GFRP bridge decks. (15th January 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Yanes-Armas, Sonia; de Castro, Julia; Keller, Thomas
• Is Part Of: Engineering structures. Volume 107(2016:Jan. 15)
• Page Start: 34
• Page End: 46
• Publication Date: 2016-01-15
• Subjects: GFRP -- Pultrusion -- Bridge deck -- Orthotropy -- Transverse behavior -- In-plane shear modulus -- Composite action -- Mechanical testing; Structural engineering -- Periodicals; Structural analysis (Engineering) -- Periodicals; Construction, Technique de la -- Périodiques; Génie parasismique -- Périodiques; Pression du vent -- Périodiques; Earthquake engineering; Structural engineering; Wind-pressure; Periodicals; 624.105
• DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.11.003
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0141-0296

Abstract

Highlights: The transverse behavior of two pultruded GFRP bridge decks was experimentally studied. They exhibited different load–displacement behavior and failure mode. The load transfer mechanisms differed and depended on the cross-sectional geometry. The bending stiffness depended on the core geometry and system in-plane shear modulus. The transverse system in-plane shear moduli were estimated from the load–displacement data. Abstract: The static transverse behavior of two pultruded GFRP deck systems with trapezoidal ( DS ) and triangular ( AS ) cell cross-sectional geometry was experimentally investigated in order to study their transverse in-plane shear stiffness. Symmetric three-point bending experiments up to failure were performed on 200-mm-wide beams. Their stiffness, strength and failure modes were compared. Different load transfer mechanisms were found in the DS (frame-dominated) and AS (truss-governed) systems depending on the cell geometry. The DS beams exhibited a lower apparent bending stiffness (24–30 times less) and degree of composite action between the flanges (14–17 times less) than the AS beams. These dissimilarities were attributed to the lower transverse in-plane shear stiffness provided by the trapezoidal core than by the triangular core. The low bound values for both system in-plane shear moduli were estimated from the experimental deflection results. The system in-plane shear modulus of the DS beams represented approximately 2–3% of that of the AS beams.