Macroscopic modeling of pedestrian and bicycle crashes: A cross-comparison of estimation methods. (August 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Macroscopic modeling of pedestrian and bicycle crashes: A cross-comparison of estimation methods. (August 2016)
- Main Title:
- Macroscopic modeling of pedestrian and bicycle crashes: A cross-comparison of estimation methods
- Authors:
- Amoh-Gyimah, Richard
Saberi, Meead
Sarvi, Majid - Abstract:
- Highlights: Cross-comparison of estimation methods: non-spatial negative binomial, random parameter negative binomial, and Poisson-Gamma-CAR. Inclusion of a comprehensive set of exposure and risk proxies for pedestrians and bicycles. The random parameter negative binomial model performed better than other selected methods. Percentage of commuters cycling or walking to work, percentage of households without motor vehicles, and mixed land use have a significant and positive correlation with the number of crashes. Abstract: The paper presents a cross-comparison of different estimation methods to model pedestrian and bicycle crashes. The study contributes to macro level safety studies by providing further methodological and empirical evidence on the various factors that influence the frequency of pedestrian and bicycle crashes at the planning level. Random parameter negative binomial (RPNB) models are estimated to explore the effects of various planning factors associated with total, serious injury and minor injury crashes while accounting for unobserved heterogeneity. Results of the RPNB models were compared with the results of a non-spatial negative binomial (NB) model and a Poisson-Gamma-CAR model. Key findings are, (1) the RPNB model performed best with the lowest mean absolute deviation, mean squared predicted error and Akaiki information criterion measures and (2) signs of estimated parameters are consistent if these variables are significant in models with the sameHighlights: Cross-comparison of estimation methods: non-spatial negative binomial, random parameter negative binomial, and Poisson-Gamma-CAR. Inclusion of a comprehensive set of exposure and risk proxies for pedestrians and bicycles. The random parameter negative binomial model performed better than other selected methods. Percentage of commuters cycling or walking to work, percentage of households without motor vehicles, and mixed land use have a significant and positive correlation with the number of crashes. Abstract: The paper presents a cross-comparison of different estimation methods to model pedestrian and bicycle crashes. The study contributes to macro level safety studies by providing further methodological and empirical evidence on the various factors that influence the frequency of pedestrian and bicycle crashes at the planning level. Random parameter negative binomial (RPNB) models are estimated to explore the effects of various planning factors associated with total, serious injury and minor injury crashes while accounting for unobserved heterogeneity. Results of the RPNB models were compared with the results of a non-spatial negative binomial (NB) model and a Poisson-Gamma-CAR model. Key findings are, (1) the RPNB model performed best with the lowest mean absolute deviation, mean squared predicted error and Akaiki information criterion measures and (2) signs of estimated parameters are consistent if these variables are significant in models with the same response variables. We found that vehicle kilometers traveled (VKT), population, percentage of commuters cycling or walking to work, and percentage of households without motor vehicles have a significant and positive correlation with the number of pedestrian and bicycle crashes. Mixed land use is also found to have a positive association with the number of pedestrian and bicycle crashes. Results have planning and policy implications aimed at encouraging the use of sustainable modes of transportation while ensuring the safety of pedestrians and cyclist. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Accident analysis and prevention. Volume 93(2016)
- Journal:
- Accident analysis and prevention
- Issue:
- Volume 93(2016)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 93, Issue 2016 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 93
- Issue:
- 2016
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0093-2016-0000
- Page Start:
- 147
- Page End:
- 159
- Publication Date:
- 2016-08
- Subjects:
- Pedestrian -- Bicycle -- Macroscopic modeling -- Random parameters -- Unobserved heterogeneity -- Spatial correlation
Accidents -- Prevention -- Periodicals
Accident Prevention -- Periodicals
Accidents -- Prévention -- Périodiques
363.106 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00014575 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.aap.2016.05.001 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0001-4575
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 0573.130000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 7612.xml