Evaluation of commonly used tear sampling methods and their relevance in subsequent biochemical analysis. (September 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Rentka, Aniko; Koroskenyi, Krisztina; Harsfalvi, Jolan; Szekanecz, Zoltan; Szucs, Gabriella; Szodoray, Peter; Kemeny-Beke, Adam
• Is Part Of: Annals of clinical biochemistry. Volume 54:Number 5(2017:Sep.)
• Page Start: 521
• Page End: 529
• Publication Date: 2017-09
• Subjects: Precorneal tear film -- tear sampling -- tear collection -- bioactive components -- tear diagnostics; Clinical chemistry -- Periodicals; Clinical biochemistry -- Periodicals; 616.075
• DOI: 10.1177/0004563217695843
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0004-5632

Abstract

The human precorneal tear film is a special body fluid, since it is a complex mixture of proteins, lipids, small bioactive molecules, and their concentrations and relative distribution represent not only the metabolic state of the ocular surface but also the systemic and local homeostasis of the outer eye and the human body. This suggests that biochemical analysis of the precorneal tear film composition may provide a non-invasive tool for diagnosis and monitoring of disease progression or treatment efficacy in human medicine. However, collecting tears is demanding, and obtaining reproducible and unaltered samples is challenging because of the small sample volumes of tears. Several methods are available for tear collection as a preparatory step of precorneal tear film analysis, and the collection method used has to be assessed since it has a critical impact on the effectiveness of the assays and on the quality of the results. Each sampling method has advantages and disadvantages; therefore, it is not easy to choose the appropriate collecting method for tear collection. To overcome these limitations various methods have been recommended by different authors for special aspects of specific tests. The aim of our review was to evaluate tear sampling methods with regard to our ongoing biochemical analysis.