Global-mean marine δ13C and its uncertainty in a glacial state estimate. (1st October 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Gebbie, Geoffrey; Peterson, Carlye D.; Lisiecki, Lorraine E.; Spero, Howard J.
• Is Part Of: Quaternary science reviews. Volume 125(2015)
• Page Start: 144
• Page End: 159
• Publication Date: 2015-10-01
• Subjects: Paleoceanography -- Physical oceanography -- Carbon reservoirs -- Last glacial maximum -- Inverse methods; Geology, Stratigraphic -- Quaternary -- Periodicals; Stratigraphie -- Quaternaire -- Périodiques; 551.79
• DOI: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2015.08.010
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0277-3791

Abstract

Abstract: A paleo-data compilation with 492 δ 13 C and δ 18 O observations provides the opportunity to better sample the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) and infer its global properties, such as the mean δ 13 C of dissolved inorganic carbon. Here, the paleo-compilation is used to reconstruct a steady-state water-mass distribution for the LGM, that in turn is used to map the data onto a 3D global grid. A global-mean marine δ 13 C value and a self-consistent uncertainty estimate are derived using the framework of state estimation (i.e., combining a numerical model and observations). The LGM global-mean δ 13 C is estimated to be 0.14‰ ± 0.20‰ at the two standard error level, giving a glacial-to-modern change of 0.32‰ ± 0.20‰. The magnitude of the error bar is attributed to the uncertain glacial ocean circulation and the lack of observational constraints in the Pacific, Indian, and Southern Oceans. To halve the error bar, roughly four times more observations are needed, although strategic sampling may reduce this number. If dynamical constraints can be used to better characterize the LGM circulation, the error bar can also be reduced to 0.05 to 0.1‰, emphasizing that knowledge of the circulation is vital to accurately map δ 13 C in three dimensions. Highlights: 492 LGM d13C observations are brought into consistency with a numerical model to form a state estimate. The glacial-to-modern d13C change is estimated to be 0.32‰ ±0.20‰. To halve the error bar, roughly four times more observations are needed. Additional dynamical constraints have the potential to reduce the uncertainty to 0.05 to 0.1‰. Knowledge of the circulation is vital to accurately map d13C in three dimensions.