City diplomacy and "glocal" governance: revitalizing cosmopolitan democracy. Issue 2 (2nd April 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Chan, Dan Koon-hong
• Is Part Of: Innovation. Volume 29:Issue 2(2016)
• Page Start: 134
• Page End: 160
• Publication Date: 2016-04-02
• Subjects: city diplomacy -- "glocal" governance -- cosmopolitan democracy -- trans-municipal networks -- "sovereignty-free" actors; Social sciences -- Periodicals; 300.5
• DOI: 10.1080/13511610.2016.1157684
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1351-1610

Abstract

Abstract : Diplomacy is in trouble. With globalization come global problems. While we live in a twenty-first-century world of interdependence, we face seventeenth-century Westphalian political institutions with defined boundaries and separated responsibilities of nation-states. When we think of diplomacy, we are thinking of state-to-state relations; however, with sovereign obligation and national interest obsession, state-to-state negotiations often fall into "gridlocks"; international policy-making also suffers from "democratic deficits". David Held offered cosmopolitan democracy as the answer, but his "world government" thesis provides no realistic policy implications. In very recent years, city-to-city ("trans-municipal") networks have received significant international recognition as cities are able to cooperate, with concrete actions, on a range of global issues. Surprisingly, scholars of international relations have largely neglected the role of cities in global governance. This paper argues for city diplomacy and "glocal" governance to fill the theoretical gap. It has two purposes: (1) to break the "conceptual jail" of regarding nation-states as the legitimate subject to manage world affairs, and open the door for cities and (2) to revisit the condition of cosmopolitan democracy, and offer a realistic model to revitalize the concept while bypassing the infeasibility of world government. In Part I, as I revisit Confucian philosophy da-tong (great unity), Rosenau's "sovereignty-free" actors and Athenian democracy, I argue that cities are our best hope to transcend nationality for the common well-being of humanity, connect local citizens to global public policy, and move towards cosmopolitan democracy. In Part II, drawing on Dahl's democratic criteria and DeBúrca's "democratic-striving approach", I will develop two "building blocks" of democracy at the global level – —equal participation and popular control. In Part III, with reference to the "building blocks", I will conduct a qualitative analysis to evaluate the cosmopolitan characteristics of C40 and develop political justifications for "trans-municipal networks".