Assessment of Impact and Recovery Needs in Communities Affected by the Elk River Chemical Spill, West Virginia, April 2014. (March 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Burrer, Sherry L.; Fechter-Leggett, Ethan; Bayleyegn, Tesfaye; Mark-Carew, Miguella; Thomas, Carrie; Bixler, Danae; Noe, Rebecca S.; Hsu, Joy; Haddy, Loretta; Wolkin, Amy
• Is Part Of: Public health reports. Volume 132:Number 2(2017)
• Page Start: 188
• Page End: 195
• Publication Date: 2017-03
• Subjects: water -- environmental health -- disaster; Public health -- United States -- Periodicals; 614.0973
• DOI: 10.1177/0033354916689606
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0033-3549

Abstract

Objectives: In January 2014, 4-methylcyclohexanemethanol spilled into the Elk River near Charleston, West Virginia, contaminating the water supply for about 120 000 households. The West Virginia American Water Company (WVAWC) issued a "do not use" water order for 9 counties. After the order was lifted (10 days after the spill), the communities' use of public water systems, information sources, alternative sources of water, and perceived impact of the spill on households were unclear to public health officials. To assist in recovery efforts, the West Virginia Bureau for Public Health and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention conducted a Community Assessment for Public Health Emergency Response (CASPER). Methods: We used the CASPER 2-stage cluster sampling design to select a representative sample of households to interview, and we conducted interviews in 171 households in April 2014. We used a weighted cluster analysis to generate population estimates in the sampling frame. Results: Before the spill, 74.4% of households did not have a 3-day alternative water supply for each household member and pet. Although 83.6% of households obtained an alternative water source within 1 day of the "do not use" order, 37.4% of households reportedly used WVAWC water for any purpose. Nearly 3 months after the spill, 36.1% of households believed that their WVAWC water was safe, and 33.5% reported using their household water for drinking. Conclusions: CASPER results identified the need to focus on basic public health messaging and household preparedness efforts. Recommendations included (1) encouraging households to maintain a 3-day emergency water supply, (2) identifying additional alternative sources of water for future emergencies, and (3) increasing community education to address ongoing concerns about water.