A study of the accuracy of mobile technology for measuring urban noise pollution in large scale participatory sensing campaigns. (February 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Aumond, Pierre; Lavandier, Catherine; Ribeiro, Carlos; Boix, Elisa Gonzalez; Kambona, Kennedy; D'Hondt, Ellie; Delaitre, Pauline
• Is Part Of: Applied acoustics. Volume 117:Part B(2017)
• Page Start: 219
• Page End: 226
• Publication Date: 2017-02
• Subjects: Sound level monitoring -- Mobile phones -- Crowdsourcing -- Participatory sensing -- Urban studies; Acoustical engineering -- Periodicals; Periodicals; 620.2
• DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2016.07.011
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0003-682X

Abstract

Abstract: The study reports on the relevancy and accuracy of using mobile phones in participatory noise pollution monitoring studies in an urban context. During one year, 60 participants used the same smartphone model to measure environmental noise at 28 different locations in Paris. All measurements were performed with the same calibrated application. The sound pressure level was recorded from the microphone every second during a 10-min period. The participants frequently measured the evolution of the sound level near two standard monitoring sound stations (in a square and near a boulevard), which enables the assessment of the accuracy and relevancy of collected acoustic measurements. The instantaneous A-weighting sound level, energy indicators such as LA, eq, LA10, LA50 or LA90 and event indicators such as the number of noise events exceeding a certain threshold Lα (NNEL ⩾ Lα ) were measured and compared with reference measurements. The results show that instantaneous sound levels measured with mobile phones correlate very well (r > 0.9, p < 0.05) with sound levels measured with a class 1 reference sound level meter with a root mean square error smaller than 3 dB(A). About 10% of the measurements for the boulevard location (respectively 20% for the square) were inaccurate (r < 0.3, p < 0.05). Nevertheless, mobile phone measurements are in agreement for the LA50 and the LA90 acoustic indicators with the fixed station (4-m high) measurements, with a median deviation smaller than 1.5 dB(A) for the boulevard (respectively 3 dB(A) for the square).