Nonadherence to Guideline Recommendations for Tympanostomy Tube Insertion in Children Based on Mega-database Claims Analysis. (January 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sajisevi, Mirabelle; Schulz, Kristine; Cyr, Derek D.; Wojdyla, Daniel; Rosenfeld, Richard M.; Tucci, Debara; Witsell, David L.
• Is Part Of: Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery. Volume 156:Number 1(2017)
• Page Start: 87
• Page End: 95
• Publication Date: 2017-01
• Subjects: AAO-HNSF clinical practice guideline -- MarketScan -- otitis media -- tympanostomy tubes -- guideline compliance; Head -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Neck -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Otolaryngology -- Periodicals; 617.51
• DOI: 10.1177/0194599816669499
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0194-5998

Abstract

Objective: To estimate the nonadherence rate of pressure equalization (tympanostomy) tube (PET) placement in the preceding 3-year period before release of the 2013 American Academy of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery Foundation clinical practice guideline (CPG). Study Design: Analysis of the Truven Health MarketScan Research Databases (2010-2012). Subjects and Methods: Medical claims data from 2010 to 2012 were analyzed. Children aged ≤12 years with otitis media (OM)–related diagnoses were identified. Adherence and nonadherence rates for OM and PET placement were analyzed through administrative codes extrapolated from the key action statements (KASs) of the CPG. KASs were aggregated to estimate the overall nonadherence and determine areas for quality improvement. Results: A total of 9, 726, 411 visits with OM-associated codes among 3, 710, 730 children were identified: 2.9% (80, 451 of 3, 239, 700) were considered nonadherent to KAS 1 because a code for PET placement occurred with a first episode of OM with effusion <3 months; 52.1% (14, 534 of 27, 913) underwent PET placement for OM with effusion of >3 months and had a concurrent hearing loss code. For those without hearing loss who underwent PET placement, 48.3% (52, 921 of 109, 583) had a diagnosis code indicating risk for speech, language, or learning problems. For each KAS, we found heterogeneity of computed nonadherence rates by region, age, and season. Conclusion: Before guideline dissemination, we found low to moderate rates of nonadherence to guideline recommendation. Deeper analysis of mega-databases could provide better insights for measurement of guideline adherence. The expansion of administrative and clinical databases provides a unique opportunity to investigate the impact of CPGs.