Many Neurology Readmissions Are Nonpreventable. (April 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Le, Sidney T.; Josephson, S. Andrew; Puttgen, Hans A.; Gibson, Lorrie; Guterman, Elan L.; Leicester, Heather M.; Graf, Carla L.; Probasco, John C.
• Is Part Of: Neurohospitalist. Volume 7:Number 2(2017:Apr.)
• Page Start: 61
• Page End: 69
• Publication Date: 2017-04
• Subjects: clinical specialty -- general neurology -- neurohospitalist -- neurosurgery -- quality -- safety -- techniques; Nervous system -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Neurology -- Periodicals; 616.8
• DOI: 10.1177/1941874416674409
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1941-8744

Abstract

Introduction: Reducing unplanned hospital readmissions has become a national focus due to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' (CMS) penalties for hospitals with high rates. A first step in reducing unplanned readmission is to understand which patients are at high risk for readmission, which readmissions are planned, and how well planned readmissions are currently captured in comparison to patient-level chart review. Methods: We examined all 5455 inpatient neurology admissions over a 2-year period to University of California San Francisco Medical Center and Johns Hopkins Hospital via chart review. We collected information such as patient age, procedure codes, diagnosis codes, all-payer diagnosis-related group, observed length of stay (oLOS), and expected length of stay. We performed multivariate logistic modeling to determine predictors of readmission. Discharge summaries were reviewed for evidence that a subsequent readmission was planned. Results: A total of 353 (6.5%) discharges were readmitted within 30 days. Fifty-five (15.6%) of the 353 readmissions were planned, most often for a neurosurgical procedure (41.8%) or immunotherapy (23.6%). Only 8 of these readmissions would have been classified as planned using current CMS methodology. Patient age (odds ratio [OR] = 1.01 for each 10-year increase, P < .001) and estimated length of stay (OR = 1.04, P = .002) were associated with a greater likelihood of readmission, whereas index admission oLOS was not. Conclusions: Many neurologic readmissions are planned; however, these are often classified by current CMS methodology as unplanned and penalized accordingly. Modifications of the CMS lists for potentially planned neurological and neurosurgical procedures and for acute discharge neurologic diagnoses should be considered.