InterPreT cancer survival: A dynamic web interactive prediction cancer survival tool for health-care professionals and cancer epidemiologists. (October 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Mozumder, Sarwar Islam; Dickman, Paul W.; Rutherford, Mark J.; Lambert, Paul C.
• Is Part Of: Cancer epidemiology. Volume 56(2018:Oct.)
• Page Start: 46
• Page End: 52
• Publication Date: 2018-10
• Subjects: Cancer survival -- Flexible parametric survival model -- Crude probability of death -- Net survival -- Interactive web-tool; Cancer -- Epidemiology -- Periodicals; Cancer -- Prevention -- Periodicals; Cancer -- Diagnosis -- Periodicals; Carcinogenesis -- Periodicals; 616.994005
• DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2018.07.009
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1877-7821

Abstract

Highlights: A newly developed interactive web-tool, "InterPreT Cancer Survival", is introduced. InterPreT is an educational tool aimed primarily at clinicians and epidemiologists. The tool facilitates communication of commonly reported cancer survival measures. Interactivity aids contrasts between different measures and patient characteristics. Other key disease characteristics will be incorporated in a future version. Abstract: Background: There are a variety of ways for quantifying cancer survival with each measure having advantages and disadvantages. Distinguishing these measures and how they should be interpreted has led to confusion among scientists, the media, health care professionals and patients. This motivates the development of tools to facilitate communication and interpretation of these statistics. Methods: "InterPreT Cancer Survival" is a newly developed, publicly available, online interactive cancer survival tool targeted towards health-care professionals and epidemiologists (http://interpret.le.ac.uk ). It focuses on the correct interpretation of commonly reported cancer survival measures facilitated through the use of dynamic interactive graphics. Statistics presented are based on parameter estimates obtained from flexible parametric relative survival models using large population-based English registry data containing information on survival across 6 cancer sites; Breast, Colon, Rectum, Stomach, Melanoma and Lung. Results: Through interactivity, the tool improves understanding of various measures and how survival or mortality may vary by age and sex. Routine measures of cancer survival are reported, however, individualised estimates using crude probabilities are advocated, which is more appropriate for patients or health care professionals. The results are presented in various interactive formats facilitating understanding of individual risk and differences between various measures. Conclusions: "InterPreT Cancer Survival" is presented as an educational tool which engages the user through interactive features to improve the understanding of commonly reported cancer survival statistics. The tool has received positive feedback from a Cancer Research UK patient sounding board and there are further plans to incorporate more disease characteristics, e.g. stage.