Macroecology to Unite All Life, Large and Small. (October 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Shade, Ashley; Dunn, Robert R.; Blowes, Shane A.; Keil, Petr; Bohannan, Brendan J.M.; Herrmann, Martina; Küsel, Kirsten; Lennon, Jay T.; Sanders, Nathan J.; Storch, David; Chase, Jonathan
• Is Part Of: Trends in ecology & evolution. Volume 33:Number 10(2018)
• Page Start: 731
• Page End: 744
• Publication Date: 2018-10
• Subjects: species–area relationship -- rarefaction -- diversity gradient -- species abundance distribution -- distance decay -- metabolic theory of ecology -- abundance occupancy -- metagenomics -- microbiome; Ecology -- Periodicals; Evolution (Biology) -- Periodicals; 576.8
• DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2018.08.005
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0169-5347

Abstract

Abstract : Macroecology is the study of the mechanisms underlying general patterns of ecology across scales. Research in microbial ecology and macroecology have long been detached. Here, we argue that it is time to bridge the gap, as they share a common currency of species and individuals, and a common goal of understanding the causes and consequences of changes in biodiversity. Microbial ecology and macroecology will mutually benefit from a unified research agenda and shared datasets that span the entirety of the biodiversity of life and the geographic expanse of the Earth. Highlights: Macroecology is the study of the mechanisms underlying general patterns of ecology across scales. A major focus of research within macroecology is understanding biodiversity patterns and their underlying processes. The field of macroecology has been biased towards charismatic macroorganisms (also known as macrobes), and has largely ignored insights and breadth that can be gained by considering microorganisms. We argue that microbial ecology and macroecology are united by common currencies (individuals and species), as well as by comparable challenges of documenting their distributions and abundances. Future directions that would lead to a unified macroecology include: expansion of spatial and temporal scales to encompass the diversity of microbes; synthesis-driven, systematic comparisons of macrobial and microbial macroecological patterns and processes; and support of interdisciplinary approaches in training, publishing, and funding to equitably value macrobial and microbial insights into understanding the rules and exceptions of life.