Is a shift from research on individual medical error to research on health information technology underway? A 40‐year analysis of publication trends in medical journals. Issue 3 (7th June 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Erlewein, Daniel; Bruni, Tommaso; Gadebusch Bondio, Mariacarla
• Is Part Of: Journal of evidence-based medicine. Volume 11:Issue 3(2018)
• Page Start: 184
• Page End: 190
• Publication Date: 2018-06-07
• Subjects: computer‐assisted decision‐making -- computerized medical records systems -- diagnostic errors -- medical errors -- medical informatics; Evidence-based medicine -- Periodicals; Systematic reviews (Medical research) -- Periodicals; 616.005
• DOI: 10.1111/jebm.12302
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1756-5383

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: In 1983, McIntyre and Popper underscored the need for more openness in dealing with errors in medicine. Since then, much has been written on individual medical errors. Furthermore, at the beginning of the 21st century, researchers and medical practitioners increasingly approached individual medical errors through health information technology. Hence, the question arises whether the attention of biomedical researchers shifted from individual medical errors to health information technology. We ran a study to determine publication trends concerning individual medical errors and health information technology in medical journals over the last 40 years. Methods: We used the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) taxonomy in the database MEDLINE. Each year, we analyzed the percentage of relevant publications to the total number of publications in MEDLINE. The trends identified were tested for statistical significance. Results: Our analysis showed that the percentage of publications dealing with individual medical errors increased from 1976 until the beginning of the 21st century but began to drop in 2003. Both the upward and the downward trends were statistically significant (P < 0.001). A breakdown by country revealed that it was the weight of the US and British publications that determined the overall downward trend after 2003. On the other hand, the percentage of publications dealing with health information technology doubled between 2003 and 2015. The upward trend was statistically significant (P < 0.001). Conclusions: The identified trends suggest that the attention of biomedical researchers partially shifted from individual medical errors to health information technology in the USA and the UK.