Supernatural versus medical: Responses to mental illness from undergraduate university students in Trinidad. (June 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ramkissoon, AnMarie Kamanie; Donald, Casswina; Hutchinson, Gerard
• Is Part Of: International journal of social psychiatry. Volume 63:Number 4(2017)
• Page Start: 330
• Page End: 338
• Publication Date: 2017-06
• Subjects: Perceptions -- attitudes -- multi-cultural -- help-seeking behaviours -- Trinidad; Social psychiatry -- Periodicals; 362.205
• DOI: 10.1177/0020764017702412
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0020-7640

Abstract

Background/Introduction: Perceptions about the aetiology of mental illness are likely to influence help-seeking behaviour. Understanding help-seeking behaviour will improve service provision and access. Therefore, this is likely to improve treatment outcomes. Methods: We assessed the perceptions and help-seeking behaviours surrounding mental illness in a Trinidadian population of 158 tertiary-level students (136 female, 22 male; mean age 30) by analysing their responses to a questionnaire which asked for responses regarding a case vignette of a 25-year-old young woman exhibiting symptoms suggestive of schizophrenia. Results: Of the respondents, 32.3% attributed the symptoms to supernatural causes. Specifically, 27.8% to someone doing her bad and 24.1% to evil spirits. In all, 77.2% of respondents indicated that mental illness was caused by medical problems and 63.3% to work stress. A minimum of 9.5% of the students therefore have dual perceptions regarding causation (77.2 + 32.3 = 109.5) Those who perceived causation to be supernatural said they would seek help from both medical ( p = .000) and supernatural ( p = .000) modalities. This also applied significantly to those who said the causation was medical, that is, seeking both religious intervention ( p = .000) and medical intervention (.000) as the first path in the health-seeking pathway. Conclusion: Dual help-seeking behaviour seems to be the functional result of an integration of religious and medical models of mental illness causation even in respondents who clearly identified only one of these as the likely cause of the illness behaviour.