Can front-of-pack labels influence portion size judgements for unhealthy foods?. Issue 15 (18th July 2018)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Can front-of-pack labels influence portion size judgements for unhealthy foods?. Issue 15 (18th July 2018)
- Main Title:
- Can front-of-pack labels influence portion size judgements for unhealthy foods?
- Authors:
- Talati, Zenobia
Pettigrew, Simone
Kelly, Bridget
Ball, Kylie
Neal, Bruce
Dixon, Helen
Shilton, Trevor
Miller, Caroline - Abstract:
- Abstract: Objective: By clearly conveying the healthiness of a food, front-of-pack (FOP) labels have the potential to influence the portion size considered appropriate for consumption. The present study examined the how the Daily Intake Guide (DIG), Multiple Traffic Lights (MTL) and Health Star Rating (HSR) FOP labels affect judgements of appropriate portion sizes of unhealthy foods compared with when no FOP label is present. Design: Respondents viewed mock packages of unhealthy variations of pizzas, cookies, yoghurts and cornflakes featuring the DIG, MTL, HSR or no FOP label, and indicated the portion size they believed should be eaten of each food on a single occasion. Setting: The survey was completed on the respondent's personal computer. Subjects: A total of 1505 Australian adults provided 4166 ratings across 192 mock packages relating to four product categories: pizza, yoghurt, cornflakes and cookies. Results: Compared with no FOP label, the HSR resulted in a small but significant reduction in the portion size selected as appropriate for consumption of pizzas and cornflakes ( P <0·05). The MTL resulted in smaller portions of cornflakes being selected compared with no FOP label ( P <0·05). Conclusions: Respondents perceived smaller portion sizes as appropriate for some, but not all, of the foods tested when FOP labels with more interpretative formats (HSR, MTL) appeared on-pack compared with no FOP label. No effect was found for the less interpretive FOP label (theAbstract: Objective: By clearly conveying the healthiness of a food, front-of-pack (FOP) labels have the potential to influence the portion size considered appropriate for consumption. The present study examined the how the Daily Intake Guide (DIG), Multiple Traffic Lights (MTL) and Health Star Rating (HSR) FOP labels affect judgements of appropriate portion sizes of unhealthy foods compared with when no FOP label is present. Design: Respondents viewed mock packages of unhealthy variations of pizzas, cookies, yoghurts and cornflakes featuring the DIG, MTL, HSR or no FOP label, and indicated the portion size they believed should be eaten of each food on a single occasion. Setting: The survey was completed on the respondent's personal computer. Subjects: A total of 1505 Australian adults provided 4166 ratings across 192 mock packages relating to four product categories: pizza, yoghurt, cornflakes and cookies. Results: Compared with no FOP label, the HSR resulted in a small but significant reduction in the portion size selected as appropriate for consumption of pizzas and cornflakes ( P <0·05). The MTL resulted in smaller portions of cornflakes being selected compared with no FOP label ( P <0·05). Conclusions: Respondents perceived smaller portion sizes as appropriate for some, but not all, of the foods tested when FOP labels with more interpretative formats (HSR, MTL) appeared on-pack compared with no FOP label. No effect was found for the less interpretive FOP label (the DIG). Interpretive FOP labels may have the potential to influence portion size judgements, albeit at modest levels. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Public health nutrition. Volume 21:Issue 15(2018)
- Journal:
- Public health nutrition
- Issue:
- Volume 21:Issue 15(2018)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 21, Issue 15 (2018)
- Year:
- 2018
- Volume:
- 21
- Issue:
- 15
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2018-0021-0015-0000
- Page Start:
- 2776
- Page End:
- 2781
- Publication Date:
- 2018-07-18
- Subjects:
- Food label, -- Portion size, -- Daily intake, -- Traffic light, -- Health star
Nutrition -- Periodicals
Nutrition policy -- Periodicals
Public health -- Periodicals
613.2 - Journal URLs:
- http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=PHN ↗
- DOI:
- 10.1017/S1368980018001702 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1368-9800
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library STI - ELD Digital store
- Ingest File:
- 7520.xml