Effectiveness of Operative and Nonoperative Care for Adult Spinal Deformity: Systematic Review of the Literature. (April 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Teles, Alisson R.; Mattei, Tobias A.; Righesso, Orlando; Falavigna, Asdrubal
• Is Part Of: Global spine journal. Volume 7:Number 2(2017)
• Page Start: 170
• Page End: 178
• Publication Date: 2017-04
• Subjects: scoliosis -- adult -- surgery -- quality of life -- systematic review; Spine -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Spine -- Diseases -- Treatment -- Periodicals; Spine -- Abnormalities -- Periodicals; Spine -- Surgery -- Periodicals; 616.73
• DOI: 10.1177/2192568217699182
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2192-5682

Abstract

Study Design: Systematic review. Objective: There is a need for synthesizing data on effectiveness of treatments for patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) due to its increasing prevalence and health care costs for these patients. The objective of this review was to estimate the effectiveness of surgery versus nonoperative care in patients with ASD. Methods: A systematic review of articles in published in English using PubMed between 2005 and 2015. Surgical and nonsurgical series that reported baseline and follow-up health-related quality of life measures of patients with ASD with a minimum 2 years of follow-up were selected. Independent extraction of articles by 2 authors using predefined data fields, including risk of bias assessment. Results: Surgery significantly reduces disability, pain, and improves patients' quality of life. The average postoperative improvement in Oswestry Disability Index was −19.1 (±9.0), Numerical Rating Scale back pain −4.14 (±1.38), Numerical Rating Scale leg pain −3.36 (±1.33), Short-Form Health Survey 36-SF36-Physical Component score 11.2 (±5.07), and Short-Form Health Survey 36-Mental Component score 9.93 (±4.96). The complication rate ranged from 9.52% to 81.52% (mean = 39.62%), and the need for revision surgery ranged from 1.72% to 40.0% (mean = 15.71%). The best existing evidence about nonoperative care of ASD is provided from observational studies with very high risk of bias. Quantitative analyses of nonsurgical cohorts did not demonstrate significant changes in quality of life of patients after 2 years of observation. Conclusions: This data may assist clinicians to counsel patients, as well as to inform health care providers and policymakers about what to expect from the treatment for ASD.