War and punitivity under anarchy. (12th September 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Wagner, Wolfgang; Werner, Wouter
• Is Part Of: European journal of international security. Volume 3:Number 3(2018)
• Page Start: 310
• Page End: 325
• Publication Date: 2018-09-12
• Subjects: Use of Force, -- International Law, -- Punishment, -- Liberalism, -- Syrian Civil War; Security, International -- Periodicals; 327.17
• DOI: 10.1017/eis.2018.8
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2057-5645

Abstract

Abstract: The individualisation of punishment is a key element in liberal narratives about international law and international relations. This narrative has become an integral part of positive international law, especially the regimes governing the use of force and the prosecution of an international crimes. Rather than punishing states or entire societies, liberals claim, punishment has become restricted to those who incurred individual guilt. To liberals, the individualisation of punishment is part of a larger process of enlightenment and civilisation that has helped to fence atavisms like revenge. We do not question the emergence of an ever more sophisticated system of individual punishment in international law. However, we argue that punitivity has been more difficult to fully channel towards individuals and away from collectives than claimed. To be sure, punitive language has by and large been banned from the laws of armed conflict. We argue, however, that the absence of a punitive vocabulary does not equal the absence of punitivity. In contrast, current state practices of using armed force are still imbued with punitivity, however silenced in the current legal framework and thus pushed underground. Realising the presence of a punitive undercurrent, we argue, adds to a more comprehensive understanding of contemporary state practices.