Candidate Tools for Integrated Weed Management in Soybean at the Northern Frontier of Production. Issue 5 (11th September 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Geddes, Charles M.; Gulden, Robert H.
• Is Part Of: Weed science. Volume 66: Issue 5(2018)
• Page Start: 662
• Page End: 672
• Publication Date: 2018-09-11
• Subjects: Martin M. Williams II, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Fecundity, -- herbicide resistance, -- interrow tillage, -- nitrogen supply, -- plant density, -- row spacing, -- seed rain, -- seedbank inputs, -- seeding rate, -- spatial arrangement.; 632.505
• DOI: 10.1017/wsc.2018.32
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0043-1745

Abstract

Abstract: The development of early-maturing soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.] varieties has led to an increase in soybean production in canola ( Brassica napus L.)-dominant crop rotations in western Canada. Herbicide-resistant (HR) volunteer B. napus can be difficult to manage in HR soybean using herbicides alone. In 2013 and 2014, four field experiments were conducted in Manitoba, Canada, to evaluate soybean row spacing, seeding density, nitrogen supply, and interrow tillage as candidate nonchemical weed management tools for an integrated program to manage volunteer B. napus in soybean. Among treatments and sites, volunteer B. napus produced about 830 seeds plant −1 and resulted in large seedbank inputs (averaging about 20, 300 seeds m −2 ). Volunteer B. napus seedling recruitment differed among sites, and resulted in two distinct classes of sites based on average seedling densities of 39 and 89 plants m −2 . Weed management tools were more effective at the sites with higher volunteer B. napus densities. At these sites, soybean yield was greater when using an increased soybean-seeding density (44% greater yield using a seeding density of 682, 500 vs. 455, 000 seeds ha −1 ) or interrow tillage (36% greater yield with vs. without using interrow tillage). Soybean row spacing (19 vs. 38 vs. 76 cm) did not affect soybean yield, unless the reduction in row spacing was combined with an increased seeding density (65% greater yield with narrow-row soybean seeded at 682, 500 vs. wide-row soybean seeded at 455, 000 seeds ha −1 ). At the sites with higher volunteer B. napus densities, seed production of canola volunteer B. napus was greater when nitrogen fertilizer was applied to simulate an environment with greater nitrogen supply (77% greater number of volunteer B. napus seeds produced with vs. without broadcast application of 23 kg N ha −1 urea). In northern climates, seeding soybean at increased densities using narrow-row spacing in fields with limited soil inorganic nitrogen and using interrow tillage in wide-row production systems are effective strategies that could augment chemical weed management in an integrated program for management of volunteer B. napus, and perhaps also other competitive early-season weeds.