The role of life cycle assessment in supporting sustainable agri-food systems: A review of the challenges. (1st January 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Notarnicola, Bruno; Sala, Serenella; Anton, Assumpció; McLaren, Sarah J.; Saouter, Erwan; Sonesson, Ulf
• Is Part Of: Journal of cleaner production. Volume 140:Part 2(2017)
• Page Start: 399
• Page End: 409
• Publication Date: 2017-01-01
• Subjects: Food supply chains -- Food LCA -- Food waste -- Sustainable production and consumption -- Agri-food products; Factory and trade waste -- Management -- Periodicals; Manufactures -- Environmental aspects -- Periodicals; Déchets industriels -- Gestion -- Périodiques; Usines -- Aspect de l'environnement -- Périodiques; 628.5
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.071
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0959-6526

Abstract

Abstract: Life cycle thinking is increasingly seen as a key concept for ensuring a transition towards more sustainable production and consumption patterns. As food production systems and consumption patterns are among the leading drivers of impacts on the environment, it is important to assess and improve food-related supply chains as much as possible. Over the years, life cycle assessment has been used extensively to assess agricultural systems and food processing and manufacturing activities, and compare alternatives "from field to fork" and through to food waste management. Notwithstanding the efforts, several methodological aspects of life cycle assessment still need further improvement in order to ensure adequate and robust support for decision making in both business and policy development contexts. This paper discusses the challenges for life cycle assessment arising from the complexity of food systems, and recommends research priorities for both scientific development and improvements in practical implementation. In summary, the intrinsic variability of food production systems requires dedicated modelling approaches, including addressing issues related to: the distinction between technosphere and ecosphere; the most appropriate functional unit; the multi-functionality of biological systems; and the modelling of the emissions and how this links with life cycle impact assessment. Also, data availability and interpretation of the results are two issues requiring further attention, including how to account for consumer behaviour. Highlights: Life cycle thinking is needed for more sustainable food supply chains. An overview of challenges for improving the robustness of LCA results is provided. Research needs at the modelling, inventory and impact assessment level are identified. Complexity of food systems and supply chains requires food-tailored methods in LCA. Capitalisation of knowledge from different disciplines is key for future development.