Failure Mode, Effect, and Criticality Analysis of the Parenteral Nutrition Process in a Mother–Child Hospital: The AMELIORE Study. (30th May 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Boulé, Marianne; Lachapelle, Sophie; Collin‐Lévesque, Laurence; Demers, Émile; Nguyen, Christina; Fournier‐Tondreau, Marylou; Thibault, Maxime; Lebel, Denis; Bussières, Jean‐François
• Is Part Of: Nutrition in clinical practice. Volume 33:Number 5(2018:Oct.)
• Page Start: 656
• Page End: 666
• Publication Date: 2018-05-30
• Subjects: medication errors -- newborn infant -- nutritional support -- parenteral nutrition -- patient safety -- pediatrics; Nutrition -- Periodicals; Diet therapy -- Periodicals; Artificial feeding -- Periodicals; 615.854
• DOI: 10.1002/ncp.10094
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0884-5336

Abstract

Abstract: Background: The parenteral nutrition (PN) process is complex and involves multiple steps and substeps, especially in pediatrics and neonatology, given the particular needs of these patients. The objective of this study was to perform a critical analysis of the PN process at the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte‐Justine to determine which potential pitfalls are related to this process and which should be prioritized when implementing corrective measures. Methods: This is a Failure Mode, Effect, and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) study. A multidisciplinary team assessed each step of the PN process and identified associated failure modes. Adapted rating scales were used to determine severity, frequency, and detectability of the failure modes. Ratings were established through multidisplinary consensus, and a criticality index (CI) was calculated for each failure mode. Results: A total of 265 failure modes were identified in the 5 major steps of the PN process. The failure mode with the highest CI was the inscription of an inaccurate weight at prescription, with a CI of 800. The step with the highest cumulative CIs was administration to patients, with a CI sum of 7691. Various recommendations aimed at minimizing the risks associated with the PN process were made following this FMECA. Additional interventions are expected to emanate from this project because data will be presented throughout the departments involved. Conclusion: This study is a successful example for other hospitals interested in carrying out the same kind of healthcare improvement initiative.