The need to revise the current methods to measure and assess static recrystallization behavior. (October 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Khoddam, S.; Hodgson, P.D.
• Is Part Of: Mechanics of materials. Volume 89(2015:Oct.)
• Page Start: 85
• Page End: 97
• Publication Date: 2015-10
• Subjects: Verification -- Mechanical characterization -- Recrystallization -- Inverse solution; Strength of materials -- Periodicals; Mechanics, Applied -- Periodicals; Résistance des matériaux -- Périodiques; Mécanique appliquée -- Périodiques; Mechanics, Applied; Strength of materials; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 620.11
• DOI: 10.1016/j.mechmat.2015.06.008
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0167-6636

Abstract

Highlights: Heterogeneous post deformation softening and interpretation of test data. Careful modeling of static recrystallization tests using an inverse solution. Experimental–numerical verification of the new and conventional models. Abstract: Heterogeneous deformation developed during "static recrystallization (SRX) tests" poses serious questions about the validity of the conventional methods to measure softening fraction. The challenges to measure SRX and verify a proposed kinetic model of SRX are discussed and a least square technique is utilized to quantify the error in a proposed SRX kinetic model. This technique relies on an existing computational–experimental multi-layer formulation to account for the heterogeneity during the post interruption hot torsion deformation. The kinetics of static recrystallization for a type 304 austenitic stainless steel deformed at 900 °C and strain rate of 0.01 s - 1 is characterized implementing the formulation. Minimizing the error between the measured and calculated torque–twist data, the parameters of the kinetic model and the flow behavior during the second hit are evaluated and compared with those obtained based on a conventional technique. Typical static recrystallization distributions in the test sample will be presented. It has been found that the major differences between the conventional and the presented technique results are due to the heterogeneous recrystallization in the cylindrical core of the specimen where the material is still partially recrystallized at the onset of the second hit deformation. For the investigated experimental conditions, the core is confined in the first two-thirds of the gauge radius, when the holding time is shorter than 50 s and the maximum pre-strain is about 0.5.