Bureaucratic control and information processing: An institutional comparison. Issue 3 (5th December 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Chan, Kwan Nok; Lam, Wai Fung
• Is Part Of: Governance. Volume 31:Issue 3(2018)
• Page Start: 575
• Page End: 592
• Publication Date: 2017-12-05
• Subjects: Administrative agencies -- Periodicals; Civil service -- Periodicals; Public administration -- Periodicals; Policy sciences -- Periodicals; 350
• DOI: 10.1111/gove.12326
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0952-1895

Abstract

Abstract : Standard models of bureaucratic control argue that politicians vulnerable to asymmetric information rely on third‐party monitoring to expand information supply. This solution to information asymmetry assumes that politicians can process all information that comes their way. However, advocates strategically oversupply information to crowd out rivals, making such a solution counterproductive. Using data on administrative reorganization in Hong Kong, we examine the alternative proposition that bureaucratic control is contingent not only on how information is obtained but also on how it is processed under two different institutional arrangements: one that splits attention across domain‐specific streams and one that concentrates attention in a single sequence. In both cases, bureaucrats refrain from major changes when politicians break from these arrangements. Moreover, bureaucratic action is significantly more likely to respond to changes in attention allocation when politicians process information in multiple streams.