Multiinstitutional national study for planning comparison on different anatomical sites. (September 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Multiinstitutional national study for planning comparison on different anatomical sites. (September 2016)
- Main Title:
- Multiinstitutional national study for planning comparison on different anatomical sites
- Authors:
- Marino, Carmelo
Bonanno, Elisa
Borzı̀, Giuseppina R.
Bottalico, Laura
Cagni, Elisabetta
Carbonini, Claudia
Casale, Michelina
Casati, Marta
Clemente, Stefania
Consorti, Rita
D'Alesio, Valentina
Esposito, Marco
Falco, Maria D.
Fedele, David
Fiandra, Christian
Frassanito, Maria C.
Gawhary, Randa E.
Giglioli, Francesca R.
Ielo, Isidora
Landoni, Valeria
Loi, Gianfranco
Lorenzini, Elena
Maggi, Giulia
Malatesta, Tiziana
Malisan, Maria R.
Martinotti, Anna
Menghi, Enrico
Nardiello, Barbara
Nigro, Roberta
Oliviero, Caterina
Pastore, Gabriella
Quattrocchi, Mariagrazia
Ragona, Riccardo
Redaelli, Irene
Reggiori, Giacomo
Ruggieri, Ruggero
Russo, Serenella
Stasi, Michele
Strigari, Lidia
Villaggi, Elena
Mancosu, Pietro
… (more) - Abstract:
- Abstract : Purpose: The SBRT working group of Italian Association of Medical Physics (AIFM) performed 4 multicenter planning studies on patients who were candidates for SBRT in the treatments of prostate, liver, lung and spine cancer with the aim of evaluating the dosimetric consistency among the different hospitals. Methods and materials: Plans were performed following the dose prescription of 35 Gy in five fractions for the planning target volume (PTV) on prostate, 54 Gy in 3 fractions for liver, 75 Gy in 3 fractions for lung and 3 fractions of 10 Gy for spine. Different techniques were used (3D-CRT, fixed-Field IMRT, VMAT, TomoTherapy, CyberKnife) and plans were compared in terms of dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters. Results: For prostate, important differences were found in terms of the HI. Doses to OARs were heterogeneous. For Liver, no significant correlations between technological factors and DVH for target and OARs were observed; the optimisation strategies selected by the planners played a key role in the planning procedure. For lung, significant correlations for PTV-gEUD2 versus PTV-HI, and MLD2 versus PTV-GI, were observed. Conclusions: Important dosimetric differences with possible clinical implications, in particular related to OARs, were found. Multicenter clinical trials on SBRT should require a preplanning study to standardize the optimization procedure. The differences both in terms of target coverage and OAR sparing suggest inter-comparison of DVHAbstract : Purpose: The SBRT working group of Italian Association of Medical Physics (AIFM) performed 4 multicenter planning studies on patients who were candidates for SBRT in the treatments of prostate, liver, lung and spine cancer with the aim of evaluating the dosimetric consistency among the different hospitals. Methods and materials: Plans were performed following the dose prescription of 35 Gy in five fractions for the planning target volume (PTV) on prostate, 54 Gy in 3 fractions for liver, 75 Gy in 3 fractions for lung and 3 fractions of 10 Gy for spine. Different techniques were used (3D-CRT, fixed-Field IMRT, VMAT, TomoTherapy, CyberKnife) and plans were compared in terms of dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters. Results: For prostate, important differences were found in terms of the HI. Doses to OARs were heterogeneous. For Liver, no significant correlations between technological factors and DVH for target and OARs were observed; the optimisation strategies selected by the planners played a key role in the planning procedure. For lung, significant correlations for PTV-gEUD2 versus PTV-HI, and MLD2 versus PTV-GI, were observed. Conclusions: Important dosimetric differences with possible clinical implications, in particular related to OARs, were found. Multicenter clinical trials on SBRT should require a preplanning study to standardize the optimization procedure. The differences both in terms of target coverage and OAR sparing suggest inter-comparison of DVH could be a useful tool to standardize treatment planning of stereotactic treatments before starting multicentric clinical trial. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Physica medica. Volume 32(2016)Supplement 3
- Journal:
- Physica medica
- Issue:
- Volume 32(2016)Supplement 3
- Issue Display:
- Volume 32, Issue 3 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 32
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0032-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- 178
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2016-09
- Subjects:
- Medical physics -- Periodicals
Biophysics -- Periodicals
Biophysics -- Periodicals
Imagerie médicale -- Périodiques
Radiothérapie -- Périodiques
Rayons X -- Sécurité -- Mesures -- Périodiques
Physique -- Périodiques
Médecine -- Périodiques
610.153 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/11201797 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/11201797 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/11201797 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗
http://www.physicamedica.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.07.292 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1120-1797
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6475.070000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 7454.xml