Improving large class performance and engagement through student‐generated question banks. Issue 4 (12th March 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hancock, Dale; Hare, Nicole; Denny, Paul; Denyer, Gareth
• Is Part Of: Biochemistry and molecular biology education. Volume 46:Issue 4(2018)
• Page Start: 306
• Page End: 317
• Publication Date: 2018-03-12
• Subjects: PeerWise -- student‐authored multiple‐choice questions -- peer evaluation -- biochemistry education; Biochemistry -- Study and teaching -- Periodicals; Molecular biology -- Study and teaching -- Periodicals; 572.071
• DOI: 10.1002/bmb.21119
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1470-8175

Abstract

Abstract: Disciplines such as Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, which involve concepts not included in the high‐school curriculum, are very challenging for many first year university students. These subjects are particularly difficult for students accustomed to surface learning strategies involving memorization and recall of facts, as a deeper understanding of the relationship between concepts is needed for successful transfer to related areas and subsequent study. In this article, we explore an activity in a very large first year Molecular Biology course, in which students create multiple‐choice questions related to targeted learning outcomes, and then answer and evaluate one another's questions. This activity encompasses elements of both self‐ and peer‐assessment and the generative tasks of creating questions and producing written feedback may contribute to a deeper understanding of the material. We make use of a free online platform to facilitate all aspects of the process and analyze the effect of student engagement with the task on overall course performance. When compared to previous semester's cohorts, we observe a pronounced improvement in class performance on exam questions targeting similar concepts to the student‐generated questions. In addition, those students that engage to a greater extent with the activity perform significantly better on the targeted exam questions than those who are less active, yet all students perform similarly on a set of isolated control questions appearing on the same exam. © 2018 by The International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 46:306–317, 2018.