Waste Solvents to Trash Haulers: Lessons Learned from Hazardous Waste Accidents. Issue 3 (18th April 2018)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Waste Solvents to Trash Haulers: Lessons Learned from Hazardous Waste Accidents. Issue 3 (18th April 2018)
- Main Title:
- Waste Solvents to Trash Haulers: Lessons Learned from Hazardous Waste Accidents
- Authors:
- Morrison, Delmar "Trey"
Stern, Michael
Osorio‐Amado, Carmen H. - Abstract:
- Abstract : Process safety management (PSM) of hazardous chemicals is a core tenet of the chemical, oil, and gas industries. Organizations in these industries have increasingly woven the elements of PSM into their strategic vision, day‐to‐day operations, and interactions with contractors and vendors. This cultural evolution has, in part, been driven by major accidents in these fields. In these industries, the chemicals, their hazardous properties, and their potential interactions, are usually either well‐defined or capable of being well‐defined. Control and mitigation strategies for those chemicals can be developed based on this available knowledge. In contrast, companies that handle wastes have experienced catastrophic accidents due to the ill‐defined nature of the hazards. This industry handles the cast‐offs, dregs, and refuse, which makes identification of the hazards and prevention of incidents more challenging. How do you implement a PSM program when your input streams can vary due to processes at a plant you do not control or monitor? Does the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) provide sufficient guidance of safely handling of wastes? The overriding theme in the incidents is that PSM is more complex to apply to unknown, mixed, and uncontrolled chemicals, both solid and liquid. To assist companies that handle wastes, this paper provides several case studies of fires and explosions involving multiple waste material handlingAbstract : Process safety management (PSM) of hazardous chemicals is a core tenet of the chemical, oil, and gas industries. Organizations in these industries have increasingly woven the elements of PSM into their strategic vision, day‐to‐day operations, and interactions with contractors and vendors. This cultural evolution has, in part, been driven by major accidents in these fields. In these industries, the chemicals, their hazardous properties, and their potential interactions, are usually either well‐defined or capable of being well‐defined. Control and mitigation strategies for those chemicals can be developed based on this available knowledge. In contrast, companies that handle wastes have experienced catastrophic accidents due to the ill‐defined nature of the hazards. This industry handles the cast‐offs, dregs, and refuse, which makes identification of the hazards and prevention of incidents more challenging. How do you implement a PSM program when your input streams can vary due to processes at a plant you do not control or monitor? Does the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) provide sufficient guidance of safely handling of wastes? The overriding theme in the incidents is that PSM is more complex to apply to unknown, mixed, and uncontrolled chemicals, both solid and liquid. To assist companies that handle wastes, this paper provides several case studies of fires and explosions involving multiple waste material handling processes at different facilities. The incidents involved numerous matrices from solid industrial wastes, EPA RCRA hazardous wastes, to waste solvents. An analysis of the lessons learned will be presented and used to provide realistic guidelines to reduce safety risks based on a pragmatic implementation of process safety management principles. The paper will also compare OSHA (Occupation Safety and Health Administration) PSM with EPA RCRA approaches to characterizing wastes versus managing the hazards, and will emphasize those elements that played critical roles in the accident case studies. © 2018 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Process Process Saf Prog 37:427–441, 2018 … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Process safety progress. Volume 37:Issue 3(2018)
- Journal:
- Process safety progress
- Issue:
- Volume 37:Issue 3(2018)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 37, Issue 3 (2018)
- Year:
- 2018
- Volume:
- 37
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2018-0037-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- 427
- Page End:
- 441
- Publication Date:
- 2018-04-18
- Subjects:
- hazardous waste -- incident investigation -- chemical reactivity
Chemical plants -- Management -- Periodicals
660 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗
- DOI:
- 10.1002/prs.11966 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1066-8527
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6849.990570
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 7457.xml