Lessons learned from Huizhou, China's unsuccessful waste-to-energy incinerator project: Assessment and policy recommendations. (April 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Lessons learned from Huizhou, China's unsuccessful waste-to-energy incinerator project: Assessment and policy recommendations. (April 2015)
- Main Title:
- Lessons learned from Huizhou, China's unsuccessful waste-to-energy incinerator project: Assessment and policy recommendations
- Authors:
- Wan, Zheng
Chen, Jihong
Craig, Brian - Abstract:
- Abstract: The Chinese government has advocated the use of waste-to-energy (WtE) incinerators to manage waste because of their high efficiency, minimal land requirement, and significant impact in terms of reducing solid mass; however, the use of WtE incinerators has been met with strong public resistance. This policy note describes Huizhou's unsuccessful WtE incinerator project. Three specific problems are discussed. First, the use of public-private partnerships to implement such projects has led to lack of transparency and corruption. Second, Huizhou has an inadequate dioxin-control strategy due to less stringent standards than those in the U.S. and Europe, along with poor monitoring practices. Third, China's buffer zone between WtE incinerators and populated areas is just 300 m, even though health impacts can be detected for distances up to 5 km. The case of Huizhou shows that high levels of investment do not necessarily result in advanced operation and management techniques. The lack of openness and transparency in government decision-making and supervision exacerbates the severity of not-in-my-backyard (NIMBY) concerns. A number of policy recommendations follow from this case study. Highlights: The use of waste-to-energy (WtE) incinerators has been met with strong public resistance in China. This policy note describes Huizhou's unsuccessful WtE incinerator project. Public-private partnerships to implement Huizhou project has led to lack of transparency. Lack of aAbstract: The Chinese government has advocated the use of waste-to-energy (WtE) incinerators to manage waste because of their high efficiency, minimal land requirement, and significant impact in terms of reducing solid mass; however, the use of WtE incinerators has been met with strong public resistance. This policy note describes Huizhou's unsuccessful WtE incinerator project. Three specific problems are discussed. First, the use of public-private partnerships to implement such projects has led to lack of transparency and corruption. Second, Huizhou has an inadequate dioxin-control strategy due to less stringent standards than those in the U.S. and Europe, along with poor monitoring practices. Third, China's buffer zone between WtE incinerators and populated areas is just 300 m, even though health impacts can be detected for distances up to 5 km. The case of Huizhou shows that high levels of investment do not necessarily result in advanced operation and management techniques. The lack of openness and transparency in government decision-making and supervision exacerbates the severity of not-in-my-backyard (NIMBY) concerns. A number of policy recommendations follow from this case study. Highlights: The use of waste-to-energy (WtE) incinerators has been met with strong public resistance in China. This policy note describes Huizhou's unsuccessful WtE incinerator project. Public-private partnerships to implement Huizhou project has led to lack of transparency. Lack of a stringent dioxin control strategy is another barrier to WtE incinerator development plans. China's safe distance standard should be reassessed and compensation mechanisms should be employed. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Utilities policy. Volume 33(2015)
- Journal:
- Utilities policy
- Issue:
- Volume 33(2015)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 33, Issue 2015 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 33
- Issue:
- 2015
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0033-2015-0000
- Page Start:
- 63
- Page End:
- 68
- Publication Date:
- 2015-04
- Subjects:
- Incinerator -- Regulation -- Policy -- Huizhou
Public utilities -- United States -- Periodicals
Public utilities -- Government policy -- United States -- Periodicals
363.6 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/09571787 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.jup.2015.01.002 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0957-1787
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 9135.377400
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 7452.xml