Farmland tenure in China: Comparing legal, actual and perceived security. (January 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Farmland tenure in China: Comparing legal, actual and perceived security. (January 2015)
- Main Title:
- Farmland tenure in China: Comparing legal, actual and perceived security
- Authors:
- Ma, Xianlei
Heerink, Nico
Feng, Shuyi
Shi, Xiaoping - Abstract:
- Highlights: We examine the magnitudes and causes of legal, actual and perceived land tenure (in)security in rural China. Two farm household surveys conducted in Gansu province and Jiangxi province are used as case studies. Households experience high legal security, but substantial insecurity of actual and perceived land tenure. Social security considerations, ambiguous laws and self-governance rules contribute to perceptions of tenure insecurity. Tenure security is higher in the Gansu case due to land quality improving investments made in that region. Abstract: This paper examines the magnitudes of legal security, actual security and perceived security of farmland tenure, and the causes of currently prevailing land tenure insecurity in rural China. Two farm household surveys conducted in the northwest of Gansu province in 2010 and in the northeast of Jiangxi province in 2011 are used as case studies. Although recent land tenure reforms have significantly improved legal tenure security, we find that farm households still experience substantial insecurity of actual and perceived land tenure. We argue that social security considerations, ambiguous formulations of laws, and village self-governance rules are three important underlying causes. Actual and perceived land tenure security is lowest in the case study region in Jiangxi province even though the share of off-farm income in rural household incomes is much larger in that region. We explain this finding from investments inHighlights: We examine the magnitudes and causes of legal, actual and perceived land tenure (in)security in rural China. Two farm household surveys conducted in Gansu province and Jiangxi province are used as case studies. Households experience high legal security, but substantial insecurity of actual and perceived land tenure. Social security considerations, ambiguous laws and self-governance rules contribute to perceptions of tenure insecurity. Tenure security is higher in the Gansu case due to land quality improving investments made in that region. Abstract: This paper examines the magnitudes of legal security, actual security and perceived security of farmland tenure, and the causes of currently prevailing land tenure insecurity in rural China. Two farm household surveys conducted in the northwest of Gansu province in 2010 and in the northeast of Jiangxi province in 2011 are used as case studies. Although recent land tenure reforms have significantly improved legal tenure security, we find that farm households still experience substantial insecurity of actual and perceived land tenure. We argue that social security considerations, ambiguous formulations of laws, and village self-governance rules are three important underlying causes. Actual and perceived land tenure security is lowest in the case study region in Jiangxi province even though the share of off-farm income in rural household incomes is much larger in that region. We explain this finding from investments in land quality improvement made by rural households in the Gansu case study region, the larger per capita land resources in that region, and the limited social security provided by off-farm employment. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Land use policy. Volume 42(2015:Jan.)
- Journal:
- Land use policy
- Issue:
- Volume 42(2015:Jan.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 42 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 42
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0042-0000-0000
- Page Start:
- 293
- Page End:
- 306
- Publication Date:
- 2015-01
- Subjects:
- Land tenure -- Legal security -- Actual security -- Perceived security -- China
Land use -- Periodicals
Land use -- Government policy -- Periodicals
Sol, Utilisation du -- Périodiques
Sol, Utilisation du -- Politique gouvernementale -- Périodiques
Electronic journals
333.7305 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/02648377 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.07.020 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0264-8377
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5146.958700
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 7426.xml