Early class III protraction facemask treatment reduces the need for orthognathic surgery: a multi-centre, two-arm parallel randomized, controlled trial. (2nd July 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Early class III protraction facemask treatment reduces the need for orthognathic surgery: a multi-centre, two-arm parallel randomized, controlled trial. (2nd July 2016)
- Main Title:
- Early class III protraction facemask treatment reduces the need for orthognathic surgery: a multi-centre, two-arm parallel randomized, controlled trial
- Authors:
- Mandall, Nicky
Cousley, Richard
DiBiase, Andrew
Dyer, Fiona
Littlewood, Simon
Mattick, Rye
Nute, Spencer J.
Doherty, Barbara
Stivaros, Nadia
McDowall, Ross
Shargill, Inderjit
Worthington, Helen V. - Abstract:
- Abstract : Objective : To evaluate whether patients who had received early class III protraction facemask treatment were less likely to need orthognathic surgery compared with untreated controls. This paper is a 6-year follow-up of a previous clinical trial.Design : Multi-centre 2-arm parallel randomized controlled trial.Setting : Eight United Kingdom hospital orthodontic departments.Participants : Seventy three 7- to 9–year-old children.Method : Patients were randomly allocated, stratified for gender, into an early class III protraction facemask group (PFG) ( n = 35) and a control/no treatment group (CG) ( n = 38). The primary outcome, need for orthognathic surgery was assessed by panel consensus. Secondary outcomes were changed in skeletal pattern, overjet, Peer Assessment Rating (PAR), self-esteem and the oral aesthetic impact of malocclusion. The data were compared between baseline (DC1) and 6-year follow-up (DC4). A per-protocol analysis was carried out with n = 32 in the CG and n = 33 in the PFG.Results : Thirty six percent of the PFG needed orthognathic surgery, compared with 66% of the CG ( P = 0.027). The odds of needing surgery was 3.5 times more likely when protraction facemask treatment was not used (odds ratio = 3.34 95% CI 1.21–9.24). The PFG exhibited a clockwise rotation and the CG an anti-clockwise rotation in the maxilla (regression coefficient 8.24 (SE 0.75); 95% CI 6.73–9.75; P < 0.001) and the mandible (regression coefficient 6.72 (SE 0.73); 95% CIAbstract : Objective : To evaluate whether patients who had received early class III protraction facemask treatment were less likely to need orthognathic surgery compared with untreated controls. This paper is a 6-year follow-up of a previous clinical trial.Design : Multi-centre 2-arm parallel randomized controlled trial.Setting : Eight United Kingdom hospital orthodontic departments.Participants : Seventy three 7- to 9–year-old children.Method : Patients were randomly allocated, stratified for gender, into an early class III protraction facemask group (PFG) ( n = 35) and a control/no treatment group (CG) ( n = 38). The primary outcome, need for orthognathic surgery was assessed by panel consensus. Secondary outcomes were changed in skeletal pattern, overjet, Peer Assessment Rating (PAR), self-esteem and the oral aesthetic impact of malocclusion. The data were compared between baseline (DC1) and 6-year follow-up (DC4). A per-protocol analysis was carried out with n = 32 in the CG and n = 33 in the PFG.Results : Thirty six percent of the PFG needed orthognathic surgery, compared with 66% of the CG ( P = 0.027). The odds of needing surgery was 3.5 times more likely when protraction facemask treatment was not used (odds ratio = 3.34 95% CI 1.21–9.24). The PFG exhibited a clockwise rotation and the CG an anti-clockwise rotation in the maxilla (regression coefficient 8.24 (SE 0.75); 95% CI 6.73–9.75; P < 0.001) and the mandible (regression coefficient 6.72 (SE 0.73); 95% CI 5.27–8.18; P < 0.001). Sixty eight per cent of the PFG maintained a positive overjet at 6-year follow-up. There were no statistically significant differences between the PFG and CG for skeletal/occlusal improvement, self-esteem or oral aesthetic impact.Conclusions : Early class III protraction facemask treatment reduces the need for orthognathic surgery. However, this effect cannot be explained by the maintenance of skeletal cephalometric change. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of orthodontics. Volume 43:Number 3(2016:Sep.)
- Journal:
- Journal of orthodontics
- Issue:
- Volume 43:Number 3(2016:Sep.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 43, Issue 3 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 43
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0043-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- 164
- Page End:
- 175
- Publication Date:
- 2016-07-02
- Subjects:
- Class III -- interceptive treatment -- orthognathic surgery -- protraction facemask
ISRCTN: 10014340
Orthodontics -- Periodicals
617.643005 - Journal URLs:
- http://jorthod.maneyjournals.org/content/by/year ↗
http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/yjor20/current ↗
https://journals.sagepub.com/home/joo ↗
http://maneypublishing.com/ ↗
http://ortho.oupjournals.org ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1080/14653125.2016.1201302 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1465-3125
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 7454.xml