The comparison of a revised Leopold matrix and fuzzy methods in environmental impact assessment, a case study: The construction of Al‐A'amiriya residential complex, Baghdad, Iraq. Issue 4 (6th August 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Asadollahfardi, Gholamreza; Asadi, Mohsen
• Is Part Of: Environmental quality management. Volume 27:Issue 4(2018)
• Page Start: 115
• Page End: 123
• Publication Date: 2018-08-06
• Subjects: construction -- environmental impact assessment -- fuzzy method -- revised Leopold matrix; Industries -- Environmental aspects -- Periodicals; Environmental protection -- Periodicals; Industrial management -- Periodicals; Environmental engineering -- Periodicals; 658.408
• DOI: 10.1002/tqem.21560
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1088-1913

Abstract

Abstract: Environmental impact assessment (EIA) is an efficient method to recognize and alleviate the unfavorable and inevitable impacts of human activity on the environment. The EIA is dependent on expert opinions, which can be influenced by personal experience and knowledge. To evaluate this influence, we carried out EIA of 6, 000 residential apartment units of Al‐A'amiriya, Baghdad, Iraq, using a revised Leopold matrix and fuzzy methods. The matrix results reflected the direct opinions of experts. The fuzzy method was developed according to the principles of expert comments. In the matrix method, the environmental impacts of each activity were evaluated by scores between −5 (very bad) to 5 (very good). The inputs to the fuzzy method were intensity and weather stability. The fuzzy estimation of the environmental impact was composed of a group of three values; P1 as the intensity, P2 as the extent, and P3 as the persistence. We gathered the expert opinions and used the Analytical Hierarchical Process to determine the weighting coefficient of each fuzzy anticipation. The matrix method was dependent on the expert opinions. The mean values of the matrix and P ‐values in each column and row scores depict the impacts of a project on the environmental aspects and each element of construction on the environment. The comparison of the results indicated an average difference of 30% between the Leopold matrix and fuzzy methods. In regard to the availability and sufficiency of data, the difference was around 10%.