Assessing bone and antler exploitation at Riparo Mochi (Balzi Rossi, Italy): implications for the characterization of the Aurignacian in South-western Europe. (September 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Tejero, José-Miguel; Grimaldi, Stefano
• Is Part Of: Journal of archaeological science. Volume 61(2015:Sep.)
• Page Start: 59
• Page End: 77
• Publication Date: 2015-09
• Subjects: Riparo Mochi -- Proto-Aurignacian -- Aurignacian -- Bone/antler exploitation -- Western Europe -- Italy; Archaeology -- Periodicals; Archéologie -- Périodiques; 930.1
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2015.05.003
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0305-4403

Abstract

Abstract: The Aurignacian typo-technological tradition has long been considered linked with the dispersal of anatomically Modern Humans over western Eurasia at the onset of the Upper Palaeolithic. In Europe it is commonly divided into two main phases, the Proto-Aurignacian and the Early Aurignacian whose definitions is based on the typo-technological features of lithics and some osseous "markers" like the split-based points. The osseous industry has recurrently been cited as a major innovation signaling the transition from Middle to Early Upper Palaeolithic. Nevertheless, recent studies strongly suggest that the real innovation is antler working, as bone working has been found to be similar in the Mousterian and the Early Upper Palaeolithic. Riparo Mochi is among the key Western European sites for assessing the nature of shifts and continuities between the Proto- and Early Aurignacian phases of the technocomplex. These data are significant for the study of the distribution of the first anatomically Modern Humans in Eurasia owing to several factors: (1) preservation of the Proto- and Early Aurignacian levels; (2) their location along the likely southern dispersal route of the Aurignacian; (3) the richness of archaeological evidence; and (4) recent re-evaluation of their chrono-stratigraphy. The study of worked osseous remains allows us to establish the comparative characteristics of animal raw material exploitation within the Riparo Mochi Aurignacian. Results demonstrate that animal raw material exploitation increases from the bottom to the top of the archaeological sequence at this site. Hunting weapons, as well as personal ornaments other than those made on shells, are only present in Early Aurignacian layers. Antler working is not documented in the Proto-Aurignacian, which is consistent with the hypothesis of the appearance of antler hunting weapons only after the Heinrich Stadial 4 and Campanian Ignimbrite climatic events. Highlights: Riparo Mochi is among the few European sites with both Proto- and Early Aurignacian layers. We compared features of Aurignacian bone and antler exploitation found at Riparo Mochi. Animal raw material exploitation increases from bottom to top of the stratigraphic sequence. Hunting weapons and personal ornaments other than shells are only present in the Early Aurignacian. Antler working is not documented in the Proto-Aurignacian. It is documented after the HS4 and CI climatic events.