Corruption: 'Culture' in the Dock. (January 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sahu, Vineet
• Other Names: Pant Anirvan guest-editor.; Ojha Abhoy K. guest-editor.
• Is Part Of: Journal of human values. Volume 23:Number 1(2017)
• Page Start: 21
• Page End: 26
• Publication Date: 2017-01
• Subjects: Corruption -- collective -- methodological individualism -- methodological holism; Management -- Moral and ethical aspects -- Periodicals; Social values -- Periodicals; Business ethics -- Periodicals; 303.4
• DOI: 10.1177/0971685816673481
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0971-6858

Abstract

Corruption in public life 1 needs to be examined in greater detail as not only an individual lapse but also a feature of the collective that either does or does not put pressure on the individual to lapse. This paper takes a methodological holistic perspective exceeding the methodological individualistic perspective in understanding corruption. The claim is that the locus of responsibility cannot be restricted to the individual alone and the collective (if there be such an entity) be left scot-free. This claim is premised on the conception that an individual's act which is in deviation of expected and established norms cannot be faulted only at the level of the individual, and careful consideration needs to be made to assess the role of the collective in precipitating the lapse(s) in the actions of the individual. This paper argues for sharing the liability of corruption in public life between the legally responsible individual as agent and the cultural milieu in which the agent operates. At a foundational level this paper calls for a reconceptualization of individual agency and decision making from being isolated and discrete, to being construed by the collective that the individual agent is a part of.