Evaluation of a policy to strengthen case management and quality of diabetes care in general practice in Denmark. Issue 8 (August 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Rudkjøbing, Andreas; Vrangbaek, Karsten; Birk, Hans Okkels; Andersen, John Sahl; Krasnik, Allan
• Is Part Of: Health policy. Volume 119:Issue 8(2015)
• Page Start: 1023
• Page End: 1030
• Publication Date: 2015-08
• Subjects: General practice -- Diabetes -- Case management -- Capitation fee -- Delivery of health care, Integrated -- Denmark; Medical education -- Periodicals; Medical policy -- Periodicals; Delivery of Health Care -- Periodicals; Education, Medical -- Periodicals; Health Education -- Periodicals; Health Planning -- Periodicals; Public Policy -- Periodicals; Enseignement médical -- Périodiques; Politique sanitaire -- Périodiques; Medical education; Medical policy; Periodicals; Electronic journals; Electronic journals; 362.1
• DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2015.04.004
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0168-8510

Abstract

Highlights: We examine a policy for strengthening case management and quality of diabetes care in general practice incentivized by novel payment mode. We found limited and geographically and organizationally varied use of the policy. Less solo practices than group practices use the policy. Younger GPs and larger practices are more likely to use the new policy. Abstract: Objectives: To evaluate the utilization of a policy for strengthening general practitioner's case management and quality of care of diabetes patients in Denmark incentivized by a novel payment mode. We also want to elucidate any geographical variation or variation on the basis of practice features such as solo- or group practice, size of practice and age of the GP. Methods: On the basis registers encompassing reimbursement data from GPs and practice specific information about geographical location (region), type of practice (solo- or group-practice), size of practice (number of patients listed) and age of the GP were are able to determine differences in use of the policy in relation to the practice-specific information. Results: At the end of the study period (2007–2012) approximately 30% of practices have enrolled extending services to approximately 10% of the diabetes population. There is regional – as well as organizational differences between GPs who have enrolled and the national averages with enrolees being younger, from larger practices and with more patients listed. Conclusions: Our study documents an organizationally and regionally varied and limited utilization with the overall incentive structure defined in the policy not strong enough to move the majority of GPs to change their way of delivering and financing care for patients with diabetes within a period of more than 5 years.