Comparison of the performance of waste leachate treatment in submerged and recirculated membrane bioreactors. (August 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Comparison of the performance of waste leachate treatment in submerged and recirculated membrane bioreactors. (August 2015)
- Main Title:
- Comparison of the performance of waste leachate treatment in submerged and recirculated membrane bioreactors
- Authors:
- Xue, Yiting
Zhao, Huihui
Ge, Lin
Chen, Zheng
Dang, Yan
Sun, Dezhi - Abstract:
- Abstract: The performances of a submerged and a recirculated membrane bioreactor (MBR) were compared for processing of fresh leachate, treated by an expanded granular sludge bed (EGSB)-anoxic/two-stage aerobic moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) system. The submerged membrane bioreactor (S-MBR) was operated at a constant permeate flux and the recirculated membrane bioreactor (R-MBR) at a constant transmembrane pressure (TMP). In both reactors, the removal efficiency of COD reached more than 93% and that of NH 4 + − N more than 97% in 100 days of operation. Long-chain alkanes, sulfur and protein-like substances in the influent could be removed by both the submerged and recirculated reactors. The frequency of cleaning of the R-MBR (5 times) was less than that of the S-MBR (7 times) in 100 days of operation. The fouling rate of the R-MBR was lower than that of the S-MBR. The inference is that the R-MBR is more appropriate for treating large amounts of wastewater than the S-MBR, which is more susceptible to membrane fouling by leachate. The study of the membrane fouling mechanism suggests that the cake layers of both reactors consisted largely of inorganic matter, i.e., CaCO3, polysaccharides and proteins. High-throughput sequencing results showed the bacteria in the cake layer to be mainly Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes . The cake layer of the R-MBR had greater bacteria community diversity than the S-MBR. Highlights: Performance comparison of waste leachate treatment with twoAbstract: The performances of a submerged and a recirculated membrane bioreactor (MBR) were compared for processing of fresh leachate, treated by an expanded granular sludge bed (EGSB)-anoxic/two-stage aerobic moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) system. The submerged membrane bioreactor (S-MBR) was operated at a constant permeate flux and the recirculated membrane bioreactor (R-MBR) at a constant transmembrane pressure (TMP). In both reactors, the removal efficiency of COD reached more than 93% and that of NH 4 + − N more than 97% in 100 days of operation. Long-chain alkanes, sulfur and protein-like substances in the influent could be removed by both the submerged and recirculated reactors. The frequency of cleaning of the R-MBR (5 times) was less than that of the S-MBR (7 times) in 100 days of operation. The fouling rate of the R-MBR was lower than that of the S-MBR. The inference is that the R-MBR is more appropriate for treating large amounts of wastewater than the S-MBR, which is more susceptible to membrane fouling by leachate. The study of the membrane fouling mechanism suggests that the cake layers of both reactors consisted largely of inorganic matter, i.e., CaCO3, polysaccharides and proteins. High-throughput sequencing results showed the bacteria in the cake layer to be mainly Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes . The cake layer of the R-MBR had greater bacteria community diversity than the S-MBR. Highlights: Performance comparison of waste leachate treatment with two types of MBRs. Mechanism study of membrane fouling of two MBRs. Microbial community analyses in cake layers by high-throughput sequencing. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- International biodeterioration & biodegradation. Volume 102(2015)
- Journal:
- International biodeterioration & biodegradation
- Issue:
- Volume 102(2015)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 102, Issue 2015 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 102
- Issue:
- 2015
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0102-2015-0000
- Page Start:
- 73
- Page End:
- 80
- Publication Date:
- 2015-08
- Subjects:
- Fresh leachate -- Submerged membrane bioreactor -- Recirculated membrane bioreactor -- Membrane fouling
Biodegradation -- Periodicals
Bioremediation -- Periodicals
Biodegradation -- Periodicals
Biodégradation -- Périodiques
Biorestauration -- Périodiques
Electronic journals
620.11223 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/09648305 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.ibiod.2015.01.005 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0964-8305
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4537.147000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 7383.xml