Stereotactic radiotherapy of the tumor bed compared to whole brain radiotherapy after surgery of single brain metastasis: Results from a randomized trial. Issue 2 (November 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kępka, Lucyna; Tyc-Szczepaniak, Dobromira; Bujko, Krzysztof; Olszyna-Serementa, Marta; Michalski, Wojciech; Sprawka, Arkadiusz; Trąbska-Kluch, Berenika; Komosińska, Katarzyna; Wasilewska-Teśluk, Ewa; Czeremszyńska, Beata
• Is Part Of: Radiotherapy and oncology. Volume 121:Issue 2(2016:Nov.)
• Page Start: 217
• Page End: 224
• Publication Date: 2016-11
• Subjects: WBRT -- Tumor bed -- Radiosurgery -- Brain metastases -- Non-inferiority trial; Oncology -- Periodicals; Radiotherapy -- Periodicals; Tumors -- Periodicals; Medical Oncology -- Periodicals; Neoplasms -- radiotherapy -- Periodicals; Radiotherapy -- Periodicals; Radiothérapie -- Périodiques; Cancérologie -- Périodiques; Tumeurs -- Périodiques; Electronic journals; 616.9940642
• DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.10.005
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0167-8140

Abstract

Abstract: Purpose: To evaluate if neurological/cognitive function outcomes in patients with resected single brain metastasis (BM) after stereotactic radiotherapy of the tumor bed (SRT-TB) are not inferior compared to those achieved with whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT). Methods: Patients with total/subtotal resection of single BM were randomly assigned either to SRT-TB ( n = 29) or WBRT ( n = 30). SRT-TB arm consisted of 15 Gy/1 fraction, or 5 × 5 Gy. WBRT consisted of 30 Gy/10 fractions. Neurological/cognitive failure was defined as a decrease of neurological score by one point or more, or a worsening of the MiniMental test by at least 3 points, or neurological death. Cumulative incidence of neurological/cognitive failure (CINCF), neurological death (CIND), and overall survival (OS) were compared. Results: Median follow-up was 29 months (range: 8–45) for 15 patients still alive. The difference in the probability of CINCF at 6 months (primary endpoint) was −8% in favor of WBRT (95% confidence interval: +17% −35%; non-inferiority margin: −20%). In the intention-to-treat analysis, two-year CIND rates were 66% vs. 31%, for SRT-TB and WBRT arm, respectively, p = .015. The corresponding figures for OS were 10% vs. 37%, p = .046. Conclusions: Non-inferiority of SRT-TB was not demonstrated in our underpowered study. More data from randomized studies are needed for confirmation of the value of this method.