Accuracy and re-test reliability of mobile eye-tracking in Parkinson's disease and older adults. Issue 3 (March 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Stuart, S.; Alcock, L.; Godfrey, A.; Lord, S.; Rochester, L.; Galna, B.
• Is Part Of: Medical engineering & physics. Volume 38:Issue 3(2016:Mar.)
• Page Start: 308
• Page End: 315
• Publication Date: 2016-03
• Subjects: Parkinson's disease -- Mobile eye-tracking -- Accuracy -- Reliability -- Saccades -- Walking; Biomedical engineering -- Periodicals; Biomedical Engineering -- Periodicals; Physics -- Periodicals; Génie biomédical -- Périodiques; Biomedical engineering; Electronic journals; Periodicals; 610.28
• DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2015.12.001
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1350-4533

Abstract

Highlights: Mobile eye-tracker accuracy and reliability has not been established in OA and PD. We provide a novel accuracy and reliability protocol for mobile eye-trackers. Saccade amplitude measured via a mobile eye-tracking device is variable. Human, technological and study protocol factors impact eye-tracker measurement. Abstract: Mobile eye-tracking is important for understanding the role of vision during real-world tasks in older adults (OA) and people with Parkinson's disease (PD). However, accuracy and reliability of such devices have not been established in these populations. We used a novel protocol to quantify accuracy and reliability of a mobile eye-tracker in OA and PD. A mobile eye-tracker (Dikablis) measured the saccade amplitudes of 20 OA and 14 PD on two occasions. Participants made saccades between targets placed 5°, 10° and 15° apart. Impact of visual correction (glasses) on saccadic amplitude measurement was also investigated in 10 OA. Saccade amplitude accuracy (median bias) was −1.21° but a wide range of bias (−7.73° to 5.81°) was seen in OA and PD, with large vertical saccades (15°) being least accurate. Reliability assessment showed a median difference between sessions of <1° for both groups, with poor to good relative agreement (Spearman rho : 0.14 to 0.85). Greater accuracy and reliability was observed in people without visual correction. Saccade amplitude can be measured with variable accuracy and reliability using a mobile eye-tracker in OA and PD. Human, technological and study-specific protocol factors may introduce error and are discussed along with methodological recommendations.