Truss models for inelastic stability analysis and design of steel plate girders. (15th December 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Smyrnaios, Sotirios V.; Iliopoulos, Aristidis; Vayas, Ioannis
• Is Part Of: Engineering structures. Volume 105(2015:Dec. 15)
• Page Start: 165
• Page End: 173
• Publication Date: 2015-12-15
• Subjects: Linear buckling analysis -- Non-linear analysis -- Lateral torsional buckling -- Critical moment -- Stability -- Truss model -- Shell FE-model; Structural engineering -- Periodicals; Structural analysis (Engineering) -- Periodicals; Construction, Technique de la -- Périodiques; Génie parasismique -- Périodiques; Pression du vent -- Périodiques; Earthquake engineering; Structural engineering; Wind-pressure; Periodicals; 624.105
• DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.09.040
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0141-0296

Abstract

Highlights: In this article I-Plate girders are represented by equivalent truss models. Buckling modes and critical load factors referring to local and lateral torsional buckling can be easily and precisely calculated. Non linear analyses considering material and geometrical non-linearities are demonstrated. The results of the proposed truss model are compared with those of a detailed shell element model. The truss model offers precise results with less computational effort and allows an easier interpretation and exploitation of the results. Abstract: The capacity of a truss model introduced in the past to represent steel and steel–concrete composite I-girders is examined to non-linear stability problems that include various stability modes. Linear buckling and geometrically and material non-linear analyses including equivalent geometrical imperfections are performed applying the truss model and a detailed shell finite element model. The results indicate that the truss model correctly determines the critical buckling modes and accurately describes the structural response up to and after the limit load. Its big advantage compared to a detailed shell element model is the easier implementation, the smaller computation time and the easier interpretation and exploitation of results. The truss model constitutes accordingly a viable alternative to Codes' prescribed simplified methods for buckling design of specific topologies, like for plate girder bridges, both in the construction and the service phase.